IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v53y2015i4p875-892.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explaining EU Effectiveness in Multilateral Institutions: The Case of the Arms Trade Treaty Negotiations

Author

Listed:
  • Iulian Romanyshyn

Abstract

This article examines the EU's participation in multilateral institutions on the example of the UN Arms Trade Treaty. The central question of the study is to what extent and under what conditions the EU can be seen as an effective actor in multilateral security negotiations. It is argued that overall the EU was an effective player during the multilateral negotiations on the ATT, but the degree of its effectiveness varies along different dimensions. The EU was rather successful in the achievement of its goals and in maintaining external cohesion, but it scored relatively low in its efforts to commit the key stakeholders to sign up to the ATT. The EU's internal export control policy, together with the high level of institutional co-ordination and Member States' interest convergence, facilitated the EU's effectiveness in the ATT negotiations, whereas the international context proved to be the major constraining factor.

Suggested Citation

  • Iulian Romanyshyn, 2015. "Explaining EU Effectiveness in Multilateral Institutions: The Case of the Arms Trade Treaty Negotiations," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 875-892, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:53:y:2015:i:4:p:875-892
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/jcms.12236
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adcock, Robert & Collier, David, 2001. "Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 95(3), pages 529-546, September.
    2. Daniel C. Thomas, 2012. "Still Punching below Its Weight? Coherence and Effectiveness in European Union Foreign Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3), pages 457-474, May.
    3. Charles Lusthaus & Fred Carden & Marie-Hélène Adrien & Gary Anderson & George Plinio Montalván, 2002. "Organizational Assessment: A Framework for Improving Performance," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 79941, February.
    4. Lusthaus, Charles & Carden, Fred & Adrien, Marie-Hélène & Anderson, Gary & Montalván, George Plinio, 2002. "Organizational Assessment: A Framework for Improving Performance," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 446.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sebastian Oberthür & Lisanne Groen, 2015. "The Effectiveness Dimension of the EU's Performance in International Institutions: Toward a More Comprehensive Assessment Framework," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(6), pages 1319-1335, November.
    2. Hanna Tuominen, 2023. "Effective Human Rights Promotion and Protection? The EU and its Member States at the UN Human Rights Council," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 935-950, July.
    3. Lisanne Groen, 2019. "Explaining European Union effectiveness (goal achievement) in the Convention on Biological Diversity: the importance of diplomatic engagement," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 69-87, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Md. Aktar Kamal & Noor Nahar Begum, 2019. "A multivariate analysis of human capital: evidence from readymade garments industry of Bangladesh," Asian Journal of Empirical Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(3), pages 46-64, March.
    2. Baltag, Dorina and Michael Smith, 2015. "EU and member states diplomacies in Moldova and Ukraine: Examining EU diplomatic performance post-Lisbon," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 19, January.
    3. Schakel, Arjan Hille, 2009. "A Postfunctionalist Theory of Regional Government," MPRA Paper 21596, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Zim Nwokora & Riccardo Pelizzo, 2017. "Measuring Party System Change: A Systems Perspective," Research Africa Network Working Papers 17/048, Research Africa Network (RAN).
    5. Gustav Lidén, 2013. "What about theory? The consequences on a widened perspective of social theory," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 213-225, January.
    6. Malte Luebker, 2019. "Can the Structure of Inequality Explain Fiscal Redistribution? Revisiting the Social Affinity Hypothesis," LIS Working papers 762, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    7. J. C. Sharman, 2007. "Rationalist and Constructivist Perspectives on Reputation," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55(1), pages 20-37, March.
    8. Jørgen Møller, 2016. "Composite and Loose Concepts, Historical Analogies, and the Logic of Control in Comparative Historical Analysis," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 45(4), pages 651-677, November.
    9. Nora Lustig, 2013. "Commitment to Equity: Diagnostic Questionnaire," Commitment to Equity (CEQ) Working Paper Series 02, Tulane University, Department of Economics.
    10. Muhammad Nabeel Siddiqui, 2013. "Impact Of Work Life Conflict On Employee Performance," Far East Journal of Psychology and Business, Far East Research Centre, vol. 12(3), pages 26-40, September.
    11. Liesbet Hooghe & Gary Marks, 2015. "Delegation and pooling in international organizations," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 305-328, September.
    12. Jose Antonio Alonso & Ana Luiza Cortez & Stephan Klasen, 2014. "LDC and other country groupings: How useful are current approaches to classify countries in a more hetergeneous developing world?," CDP Background Papers 021, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
    13. Jacint Jordana & Xavier Fernández‐i‐Marín & Andrea C. Bianculli, 2018. "Agency proliferation and the globalization of the regulatory state: Introducing a data set on the institutional features of regulatory agencies," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(4), pages 524-540, December.
    14. Vanessa Alexandra Boese & Matthew Charles Wilson, 2023. "Contestation and participation: Concepts, measurement, and inference," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 26(2), pages 89-106, June.
    15. Willem E. Saris & André Pirralha & Diana Zavala-Rojas, 2018. "Testing the Comparability of Different Types of Social Indicators Across Groups," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 135(3), pages 927-939, February.
    16. Anete Veidemane & Frans Kaiser & Daniela Craciun, 2021. "Inclusive Higher Education Access for Underrepresented Groups: It Matters, But How Can Universities Measure It?," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(3), pages 44-57.
    17. Merran Hulse, 2014. "Actorness beyond the European Union: Comparing the International Trade Actorness of SADC and ECOWAS," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 547-565, May.
    18. Svend-Erik Skaaning, 2018. "Different Types of Data and the Validity of Democracy Measures," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 105-116.
    19. Maria J. Debre & Hylke Dijkstra, 2023. "Are international organisations in decline? An absolute and relative perspective on institutional change," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(1), pages 16-30, February.
    20. Peter Mascini & Yannis Bacharias, 2012. "Integrating a Top‐Down and a Bottom‐Up Approach: Formal and Informal Risk‐Handling Strategies in a Utility Company," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(9), pages 1547-1560, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:53:y:2015:i:4:p:875-892. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.