IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v36y1998i1p101-114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who are EU? Ambiguities in the Concept of Competitiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Susan Strange

Abstract

Borrowing the title from Robert Reich’s 1990 article, ‘Who is US?’, I argue that it is first necessary to clear up some of the ambiguities in the current debate about European competitiveness if we are to develop a coherent and effective industrial and macroeconomic policy for Europe. Reich was adamant that the foreign‐owned firms (FOFs) that located production – and increasingly their research and design teams – in America were doing more for the American people (and, in the long run, for the American economy) than firms registered and headquartered in the US but whose output, and employees, were largely located elsewhere. Now that Asian firms as well as American ones are increasingly locating production in Europe rather than at home, the same argument holds good for Europe. Second, in order to determine and adopt the policies appropriate to making national societies, rather than national firms, competitive and viable, it is necessary to clear up some of the confusion concerning the causes of increased competition among states and among firms. It is argued that these causes are structural and (since the end of the Cold War) global. The most important of these are the accelerating rate of technological change and its escalating capital costs and, as auxiliary factors, the added opportunities for internationalizing production opened up by the increased mobility of capital, the improved efficiency of transport and communications and the general liberalization of the global trading system. Third, if the conclusions of the first and second part are accepted, the crucial political issue concerns the choice of means appropriate in a world market economy to the chosen end of European competitiveness in terms of societies rather than of firms. The third part of the argument therefore discusses some of the relevant policy issues: trade and investment policies, EU enlargement, the common currency, social rules and charters, and welfare issues like health and education.

Suggested Citation

  • Susan Strange, 1998. "Who are EU? Ambiguities in the Concept of Competitiveness," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 101-114, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:36:y:1998:i:1:p:101-114
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-5965.00099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00099
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-5965.00099?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Linsi, Lukas, 2019. "The discourse of competitiveness and the dis-embedding of the national economy," SocArXiv s4j6y, Center for Open Science.
    2. Ioanna Kastelli & Yannis D. Caloghirou, 2014. "The impact of knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship on the growth and competitiveness of European traditional industries," Chapters, in: Hartmut Hirsch-Kreinsen & Isabel Schwinge (ed.), Knowledge-Intensive Entrepreneurship in Low-Tech Industries, chapter 4, pages 67-92, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Narula, Rajneesh & Duysters, Geert, 2004. "Globalisation and trends in international R&D alliances," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 199-218.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:36:y:1998:i:1:p:101-114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.