IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamest/v44y1993i2p70-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A fuzzy linguistic approach generalizing Boolean Information Retrieval: A model and its evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Gloria Bordogna
  • Gabriella Pasi

Abstract

The generalization of Boolean Information Retrieval Systems (IRS) is still an open research field; in fact, though such systems are diffused on the market, they present some limitations; one of the main features lacking in these systems is the ability to deal with the “imprecision” and “subjectivity” characterizing retrieval activity. However, the replacement of such systems would be much more costly than their evolution through the incorporation of new features to enhance their efficiency and effectiveness. Previous efforts in this area have led to the introduction of numeric weights to improve both document representation and query language. By attaching a numeric weight to a term in a query, a user can provide a quantitative description of the “importance” of that term in the documents he or she is looking for. However, the use of weights requires a clear knowledge of their semantics for translating a fuzzy concept into a precise numeric value. Our acquaintance with these problems led us to define, starting from an existing weighted Boolean retrieval model, a linguistic extension, formalized within fuzzy set theory, in which numeric query weights are replaced by linguistic descriptors which specify the degree of importance of the terms. This fuzzy linguistic model is defined and an evaluation is made of its implementation on a Boolean IRS. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • Gloria Bordogna & Gabriella Pasi, 1993. "A fuzzy linguistic approach generalizing Boolean Information Retrieval: A model and its evaluation," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 44(2), pages 70-82, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:44:y:1993:i:2:p:70-82
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199303)44:23.0.CO;2-I
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199303)44:23.0.CO;2-I
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199303)44:23.0.CO;2-I?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yan, Hong-Bin & Ma, Tieju & Huynh, Van-Nam, 2017. "On qualitative multi-attribute group decision making and its consensus measure: A probability based perspective," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 94-117.
    2. Zhen-Song Chen & Min Li & Wen-Tao Kong & Kwai-Sang Chin, 2019. "Evaluation and Selection of HazMat Transportation Alternatives: A PHFLTS- and TOPSIS-Integrated Multi-Perspective Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-33, October.
    3. Olga Porro & Francesc Pardo-Bosch & Núria Agell & Mónica Sánchez, 2020. "Understanding Location Decisions of Energy Multinational Enterprises within the European Smart Cities’ Context: An Integrated AHP and Extended Fuzzy Linguistic TOPSIS Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-29, May.
    4. Jiawei Shi & Yan Zhou, 2022. "Group Decision Making for Product Innovation Based on PZB Model in Fuzzy Environment: A Case from New-Energy Storage Innovation Design," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-26, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamest:v:44:y:1993:i:2:p:70-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.