IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/istatr/v90y2022is1ps17-s36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Likelihood‐Based Inference for the Finite Population Mean with Post‐Stratification Information Under Non‐Ignorable Non‐Response

Author

Listed:
  • Sahar Z. Zangeneh
  • Roderick J. Little

Abstract

We describe models and likelihood‐based estimation of the finite population mean for a survey subject to unit non‐response, when post‐stratification information is available from external sources. A feature of the models is that they do not require the assumption that the data are missing at random (MAR). As a result, the proposed models provide estimates under weaker assumptions than those required in the absence of post‐stratification information, thus allowing more robust inferences. In particular, we describe models for estimation of the finite population mean of a survey outcome with categorical covariates and externally observed categorical post‐stratifiers. We compare inferences from the proposed method with existing design‐based estimators via simulations. We apply our methods to school‐level data from California Department of Education to estimate the mean academic performance index (API) score in years 1999 and 2000. We end with a discussion.

Suggested Citation

  • Sahar Z. Zangeneh & Roderick J. Little, 2022. "Likelihood‐Based Inference for the Finite Population Mean with Post‐Stratification Information Under Non‐Ignorable Non‐Response," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 90(S1), pages 17-36, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:istatr:v:90:y:2022:i:s1:p:s17-s36
    DOI: 10.1111/insr.12527
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12527
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/insr.12527?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kott, Phillip S. & Chang, Ted, 2010. "Using Calibration Weighting to Adjust for Nonignorable Unit Nonresponse," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 105(491), pages 1265-1275.
    2. Nilanjan Chatterjee & Yi-Hau Chen & Paige Maas & Raymond J. Carroll, 2016. "Constrained Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Model Calibration Using Summary-Level Information From External Big Data Sources," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(513), pages 107-117, March.
    3. Little R.J., 2004. "To Model or Not To Model? Competing Modes of Inference for Finite Population Sampling," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 99, pages 546-556, January.
    4. Roderick J. Little & Donald B. Rubin & Sahar Z. Zangeneh, 2017. "Conditions for Ignoring the Missing-Data Mechanism in Likelihood Inferences for Parameter Subsets," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(517), pages 314-320, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shixiao Zhang & Peisong Han & Changbao Wu, 2023. "Calibration Techniques Encompassing Survey Sampling, Missing Data Analysis and Causal Inference," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 91(2), pages 165-192, August.
    2. Debashis Ghosh & Michael S. Sabel, 2022. "A Weighted Sample Framework to Incorporate External Calculators for Risk Modeling," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 14(3), pages 363-379, December.
    3. Little Roderick J., 2013. "Discussion," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 29(3), pages 363-366, June.
    4. Tian Gu & Jeremy Michael George Taylor & Bhramar Mukherjee, 2023. "A synthetic data integration framework to leverage external summary‐level information from heterogeneous populations," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3831-3845, December.
    5. Wang, Lei & Zhao, Puying & Shao, Jun, 2021. "Dimension-reduced semiparametric estimation of distribution functions and quantiles with nonignorable nonresponse," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    6. Han Zhang & Lu Deng & William Wheeler & Jing Qin & Kai Yu, 2022. "Integrative analysis of multiple case‐control studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(3), pages 1080-1091, September.
    7. Szymkowiak Marcin & Wilak Kamil, 2021. "Repeated weighting in mixed-mode censuses," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 7(1), pages 26-46, March.
    8. Kunihama, T. & Herring, A.H. & Halpern, C.T. & Dunson, D.B., 2016. "Nonparametric Bayes modeling with sample survey weights," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 41-48.
    9. Lukachko, Alicia & Hatzenbuehler, Mark L. & Keyes, Katherine M., 2014. "Structural racism and myocardial infarction in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 42-50.
    10. Carl-Erik Särndal & Imbi Traat & Kaur Lumiste, 2018. "Interaction Between Data Collection And Estimation Phases In Surveys With Nonresponse," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 19(2), pages 183-200, June.
    11. Marivoet, Wim & De Herdt, Tom, 2017. "From figures to facts: making sense of socio-economic surveys in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)," IOB Analyses & Policy Briefs 23, Universiteit Antwerpen, Institute of Development Policy (IOB).
    12. Ying Sheng & Yifei Sun & Chiung‐Yu Huang & Mi‐Ok Kim, 2022. "Synthesizing external aggregated information in the presence of population heterogeneity: A penalized empirical likelihood approach," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(2), pages 679-690, June.
    13. Geoffrey Jones & Wesley O. Johnson, 2016. "A Bayesian Superpopulation Approach to Inference for Finite Populations Based on Imperfect Diagnostic Outcomes," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 21(2), pages 314-327, June.
    14. Cao, Yongxiu & Yu, Jichang, 2023. "Adjusting for unmeasured confounding in survival causal effect using validation data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    15. Hamori, Shigeyuki & Motegi, Kaiji & Zhang, Zheng, 2019. "Calibration estimation of semiparametric copula models with data missing at random," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 85-109.
    16. J. Andrew Royle, 2009. "Analysis of Capture–Recapture Models with Individual Covariates Using Data Augmentation," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(1), pages 267-274, March.
    17. Albert S. Berahas & Jiahao Shi & Zihong Yi & Baoyu Zhou, 2023. "Accelerating stochastic sequential quadratic programming for equality constrained optimization using predictive variance reduction," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 86(1), pages 79-116, September.
    18. Alice Bartolini & Rosa Maria Di Biase & Lorenzo Fattorini & Sara Franceschi & Agnese Marcelli, 2021. "Design-based mapping of plant species presence, association and richness by nearest-neighbor interpolation," Department of Economics University of Siena 854, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    19. Takumi Saegusa, 2020. "Confidence bands for a distribution function with merged data from multiple sources," Statistics in Transition New Series, Polish Statistical Association, vol. 21(4), pages 144-158, August.
    20. Ivan Faiella, 2010. "The use of survey weights in regression analysis," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 739, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:istatr:v:90:y:2022:i:s1:p:s17-s36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isiiinl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.