IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v42y2018i1p115-125.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Power and Power Over Space: How the Bourgeoisie Reproduces itself in the City

Author

Listed:
  • Monique Pinçon†Charlot
  • Michel Pinçon

Abstract

Urban sociology has long ignored districts of wealth and privilege in cities because they harbor few ‘social problems’ and the class background of sociologists has not inclined them to venture there. In France after 1968, the continued attraction of Marxism and the sulfurous reputation of sociology conspired to make such investigation difficult. Pierre Bourdieu pioneered it with his landmark book on the bourgeoisie, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. This essay reports on two decades of research extending Bourdieu's model of social space to study the territories and strategies of the French high bourgeoisie and aristocracy. The dominant class lives in reserved upscale districts and this seclusion, resulting from the elective spatial aggregation of familial dynasties, is a fundamental characteristic of the group. Segregative isolation is strengthened by specific institutions, such as society balls and social clubs, entrusted with effecting class closure and perpetuation. But, in the greater Paris region, the best districts also attract businesses (corporate headquarters, luxury firms), and thus employment that prompts the established bourgeoisie to migrate westwards in an endless search for social exclusivity. In addition to their Paris homes, upper†class dynasties possess family properties (a castle or a large manor house) in the provincial hinterland that serve as a basis for paternalistic forms of sociability, linking them to the local lower class via such institutions as riding to hounds. Spaces reserved by and for the high bourgeoisie are major vectors of social reproduction and, along with family and elite schools, help to train heirs suited to safeguarding and valorizing their inherited assets.

Suggested Citation

  • Monique Pinçon†Charlot & Michel Pinçon, 2018. "Social Power and Power Over Space: How the Bourgeoisie Reproduces itself in the City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 115-125, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:42:y:2018:i:1:p:115-125
    DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.12533
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12533
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1468-2427.12533?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rafael Carranza & Gabriel Otero & Dante Contreras, 2020. "Spatial divisions of poverty and wealth: How much does segregation matter for educational achievement?," Working Papers 543, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    2. Aidan Mosselson, 2020. "Habitus, spatial capital and making place: Housing developers and the spatial praxis of Johannesburg’s inner-city regeneration," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(2), pages 277-296, March.
    3. Hannu Ruonavaara, 2022. "The Anatomy of Neighbour Relations," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 27(2), pages 379-395, June.
    4. Median Mutiara, 2018. "Noise Complaints between Japanese Neighbors and Migrants in Rural Japan: From the Perspectives of Noisemakers," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-25, December.
    5. Patrick Le Galès, 2022. "Castells, Cities And The Network Society: Formidable Ambition, Great Intuitions, Selective Legacy," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 113(3), pages 240-249, July.
    6. Welté, Jean-Baptiste & Cayla, Julien & Cova, Bernard, 2022. "The intimacy trap: Navigating the commercial friendships of luxury," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 649-659.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:42:y:2018:i:1:p:115-125. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.