IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v12y2021i1p149-156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The EU in Search of Autonomy in the Era of Chinese Expansionism and COVID‐19 Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Santander
  • Antonios Vlassis

Abstract

Given the global changes created by China's expanding international influence, increasingly intense Sino–American competition and the growing multi‐polarisation of the international political economy, is there any specific place that the European Union can hope to occupy? For tentative answers to this question, this analysis of Chinese economic expansionism aims to highlight the rationale behind the EU's foreign policy action and to explore how this expansionism has impacted on the preservation of the European unity and whether Chinese economic power has undermined integration and triggered disunity within the EU. We look at the period starting in 2013, the year when China launched its ‘New Silk Road’ initiative, right up to the global lockdown due to the COVID‐19 pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Santander & Antonios Vlassis, 2021. "The EU in Search of Autonomy in the Era of Chinese Expansionism and COVID‐19 Pandemic," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(1), pages 149-156, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:149-156
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12899
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12899
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.12899?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anabel Gonzalez & Nicolas Veron, 2019. "EU Trade Policy amid the China-US Clash: Caught in the Cross-Fire?," Working Paper Series WP19-13, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
    2. Anabel González & Nicolas Véron, 2019. "EU trade policy amid the China-US clash- caught in the crossfire?," Working Papers 32427, Bruegel.
    3. Lisbeth Aggestam & Adrian Hyde‐Price, 2019. "Double Trouble: Trump, Transatlantic Relations and European Strategic Autonomy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(S1), pages 114-127, September.
    4. Sophie Meunier & Milada Anna Vachudova, 2018. "Liberal Intergovernmentalism, Illiberalism and the Potential Superpower of the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(7), pages 1631-1647, November.
    5. Thomas Christiansen & Richard Maher, 2017. "The rise of China—challenges and opportunities for the European Union," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 121-131, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Laurent, & Jeudy Bruno-Philippe., 2021. "Le blocage de l’OMC, un révélateur de la crise du multilatéralisme ?," Bulletin de la Banque de France, Banque de France, issue 234.
    2. Liu, Nan, 2020. "Trade war from the Chinese trenches," MPRA Paper 103929, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Liu, Nan, 2020. "Trade war from the Chinese trenches," MPRA Paper 110175, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Tomasz Kamiński, 2019. "What are the factors behind the successful EU-China cooperation on the subnational level? Case study of the Lodzkie region in Poland," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 227-242, June.
    5. Hai Yang, 2018. "Time to up the game? Middle Eastern security and Chinese strategic involvement," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 283-296, September.
    6. Ramon Pacheco Pardo, 2018. "Europe’s financial security and Chinese economic statecraft: the case of the Belt and Road Initiative," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 237-250, September.
    7. Pedro Emanuel Mendes, 2023. "The Dynamics of Change in United States Foreign Policy: Contexts, Leadership, and Hegemonic Legitimacy," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-24, October.
    8. Scott Lavery & Davide Schmid, 2021. "European Integration and the New Global Disorder," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1322-1338, September.
    9. Lei Liu & Tong Wu & Ziqianhong Wan, 2019. "The EU-China relationship in a new era of global climate governance," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 243-254, June.
    10. Anna Grzywacz, 2020. "Closer to a threat than an opportunity: Polish perception of China’s rise and international engagement," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 177-194, March.
    11. Andrea Carati & Andrea Locatelli, 2023. "All the President's men. Leadership style, advisory system and Donald Trump's mixed record in foreign policy," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(1), pages 95-106, February.
    12. Adhiambo Lucy Felister & Dr. Francis Xavier Ichani, 2022. "Compulsory Adjudication of International Court of Justice and Pacific Settlement of Kenya-Somalia Maritime Dispute," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(5), pages 563-573, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:149-156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.