IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/germec/v10y2009i3p364-367.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Misleading Rankings of Research in Business: A Reply

Author

Listed:
  • Klaus Ritzberger

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Klaus Ritzberger, 2009. "Misleading Rankings of Research in Business: A Reply," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 10(3), pages 364-367, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:germec:v:10:y:2009:i:3:p:364-367
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0475.2009.00484.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0475.2009.00484.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1468-0475.2009.00484.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberto Serrano, 2004. "The Measurement of Intellectual Influence: the Views of a Sceptic," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 1(3), pages 1-6.
    2. Fabel Oliver & Hein Miriam & Hofmeister Robert, 2009. "Research Productivity in Business Economics: A Second Reply," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 10(3), pages 372-374, August.
    3. Laband, David N & Piette, Michael J, 1994. "The Relative Impacts of Economics Journals: 1970-1990," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 32(2), pages 640-666, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Klaus Ritzberger, 2008. "A Ranking of Journals in Economics and Related Fields," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 9(4), pages 402-430, November.
    2. Carmen Herrero & Antonio Villar, 2013. "On the Comparison of Group Performance with Categorical Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-7, December.
    3. Klaus Ritzberger, 2008. "Eine invariante Bewertung wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Fachzeitschriften," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 9(3), pages 267-285, August.
    4. Klaus Ritzberger, 2009. "Misleading Rankings of Research in Business: A Reply -super-," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 10, pages 364-367, August.
    5. Wakefield, Robin, 2008. "Networks of accounting research: A citation-based structural and network analysis," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 228-244.
    6. Gianfranco Di Vaio & Jacob Louis Weisdorf, 2010. "Ranking economic history journals: a citation-based impact-adjusted analysis," Cliometrica, Journal of Historical Economics and Econometric History, Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC), vol. 4(1), pages 1-17, January.
    7. George Emm Halkos & Nickolaos G. Tzeremes, 2011. "Measuring economic journals’ citation efficiency: a data envelopment analysis approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 88(3), pages 979-1001, September.
    8. Pantelis Kalaitzidakis & Theofanis P. Mamuneas & Thanasis Stengos, 2011. "An updated ranking of academic journals in economics," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 44(4), pages 1525-1538, November.
    9. Melody Lo & M. C. Sunny Wong & Franklin G. Mixon, 2008. "Ranking Economics Journals, Economics Departments, and Economists Using Teaching‐Focused Research Productivity," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 74(3), pages 894-906, January.
    10. Pedro Cosme Vieira & Aurora A. C. Teixeira, 2010. "Are finance, management, and marketing autonomous fields of scientific research? An analysis based on journal citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(3), pages 627-646, December.
    11. Thorsten Hennig-Thurau & Gianfranco Walsh & Ulf Schrader, 2004. "VHB-JOURQUAL: Ein Ranking von betriebswirtschaftlich-relevanten Zeitschriften auf der Grundlage von Expertenurteilen," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 56(6), pages 520-545, September.
    12. Rolf Sternberg, 2015. "The publication and citation behaviour of economic geographers and geographical economists compared," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 35(1), pages 1-27, February.
    13. Ignacio Palacios-Huerta & Oscar Volij, 2004. "The Measurement of Intellectual Influence," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 72(3), pages 963-977, May.
    14. László Á. Kóczy & Alexandru Nichifor & Martin Strobel, 2009. "Article length bias in journal rankings," Working Paper Series 0902, Óbuda University, Keleti Faculty of Business and Management.
    15. Matthias Sutter & Martin G. Kocher, 2001. "Tools for Evaluating Research Output," Evaluation Review, , vol. 25(5), pages 555-566, October.
    16. Klaus Wohlrabe, 2016. "Taking the Temperature: A Meta-Ranking of Economics Journals," CESifo Working Paper Series 5726, CESifo.
    17. Cloos, Janis & Greiff, Matthias & Rusch, Hannes, 2020. "Geographical Concentration and Editorial Favoritism within the Field of Laboratory Experimental Economics (RM/19/029-revised-)," Research Memorandum 014, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    18. Di Vaio, Gianfranco & Waldenström, Daniel & Weisdorf, Jacob, 2012. "Citation success: Evidence from economic history journal publications," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 92-104.
    19. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:1:y:2004:i:4:p:1-19 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Axel Schlinghoff & Uschi Backes-Gellner, 2002. "Publikationsindikatoren und die Stabilität wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftenrankings," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 343-362, June.
    21. Geert Campenhout & Tom Caneghem & Steve Uytbergen, 2008. "A comparison of overall and sub-area journal influence: The case of the accounting literature," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 77(1), pages 61-90, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:germec:v:10:y:2009:i:3:p:364-367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfsocea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.