IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/finmgt/v48y2019i2p473-504.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy Uncertainty and the Dual Role of Corporate Political Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Chansog (Francis) Kim
  • Incheol Kim
  • Christos Pantzalis
  • Jung Chul Park

Abstract

Firms use active political strategies not only to mitigate uncertainty emanating from legislative activity, but also to enhance their growth opportunities. We find that a firm's systematic risk (beta) can be hedged away by employing various political strategies involving the presence of former politicians on corporate boards of directors, contributions to political campaigns, and corporate lobbying activities. The hedging effect is greater when firms operate in more uncertain industries. In addition, active political strategies are associated with greater firm heterogeneity and make real options more value relevant as potential drivers of competitive advantages in uncertain environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Chansog (Francis) Kim & Incheol Kim & Christos Pantzalis & Jung Chul Park, 2019. "Policy Uncertainty and the Dual Role of Corporate Political Strategies," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 48(2), pages 473-504, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:finmgt:v:48:y:2019:i:2:p:473-504
    DOI: 10.1111/fima.12226
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/fima.12226
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/fima.12226?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Agoraki, Maria-Eleni K. & Gounopoulos, Dimitrios & Kouretas, Georgios P., 2022. "U.S. banks’ IPOs and political money contributions," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    2. Hoepner, Andreas G.F. & Lin, Ming-Tsung, 2022. "Do shareholder views affect corporate political activities?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    3. Li, Mingsheng & Liu, Desheng & Peng, Hongfeng & Zhang, Luxiu, 2022. "Political connection and its impact on equity market," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    4. Ganguly, Kousik & Mishra, Ajay Kumar & Parikh, Bhavik, 2023. "Do Political connections influence investment decisions? Evidence from India," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    5. Goodell, John W. & Li, Mingsheng & Liu, Desheng & Peng, Hongfeng, 2022. "Depoliticization and market efficiency: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PB).
    6. Meng, Yun & Pantzalis, Christos & Park, Jung Chul, 2023. "Why corporate political geography matters for stock returns," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 71-96.
    7. Youngsoo Kim & Jung Chul Park, 2022. "Presidential power and stock returns," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 51(2), pages 455-499, June.
    8. Christos Pantzalis & Jung Chul Park, 2020. "Stock Market Consequences Of Political Vibrancy," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 43(3), pages 491-542, August.
    9. Hossain, Ashrafee Tanvir & Hossain, Takdir & Kryzanowski, Lawrence, 2021. "Political corruption and corporate payouts," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    10. Fard, Amirhossein & Javadi, Siamak & Kim, Incheol, 2020. "Environmental regulation and the cost of bank loans: International evidence," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    11. Shaddy Douidar & Christos Pantzalis & Jung Chul Park, 2023. "Political geography and the value relevance of real options," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 58(4), pages 703-733, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:finmgt:v:48:y:2019:i:2:p:473-504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.