IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/eurcho/v21y2022i3p37-47.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Sustainability Implications of Transitions to Agroecology: a Transdisciplinary Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Gerald Schwarz
  • Francesco Vanni
  • David Miller
  • Janne Helin
  • Jaroslav Pražan
  • Fabrizio Albanito
  • Mihaela Fratila
  • Francesco Galioto
  • Oriana Gava
  • Katherine Irvine
  • Jan Landert
  • Alba Linares Quero
  • Andreas Mayer
  • Daniel Monteleone
  • Adrian Muller
  • Elin Röös
  • Alexandra Smyrniotopoulou
  • Audrey Vincent
  • George Vlahos
  • Andis Zīlāns

Abstract

Successful transitions to agroecology require shared understanding of the sustainability implications of transitions for food systems. To gain such understanding, a transdisciplinary approach is increasingly called for by funders, end users of research and scientists. Transdisciplinary processes were used in the UNISECO project to develop strategic pathways that enable transitions to agroecology in case studies across Europe. These strategic pathways were combined with scenarios of EU food systems in 2050, in which combinations of agroecological farming and food consumption practices were assessed. These were then reviewed considering selected UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as a reference for discussing the sustainability implications of transitions to agroecology. Sustainability implications were identified for several SDGs including Zero Hunger (SDG 2), Quality Education (SDG 4), Responsible Consumption and Production (SDG 12), Climate Action (SDG 13) and Life on Land (SDG 15). Key factors contributing to the sustainability of transitions to agroecology are: i) mature social capital and improved farmer knowledge of the benefits of agroecological practices; ii) strengthened collaborative actions and collective institutions to increase negotiating power within the value‐chain; and, iii) changes in consumer behaviour and diets. These factors highlight the need for a food system perspective in transitions to agroecology and supporting policies. This in turn highlights the meaningful role of transdisciplinary research in strengthening the sustainability of European food systems. Les transitions réussies vers l'agroécologie nécessitent une compréhension partagée des implications des transitions en termes de durabilité pour les systèmes alimentaires. Pour parvenir à une telle compréhension, une approche transdisciplinaire est de plus en plus demandée par les bailleurs de fonds, les utilisateurs finaux de la recherche et les scientifiques. Des processus transdisciplinaires ont été utilisés dans le projet UNISECO pour développer des voies stratégiques qui permettent des transitions vers l'agroécologie dans des études de cas à travers l'Europe. Ces voies stratégiques ont été combinées avec des scénarios sur des systèmes alimentaires de l'Union européenne en 2050, dans lesquels des combinaisons d'agriculture agroécologique et de pratiques de consommation alimentaire ont été évaluées. Les résultats ont ensuite été examinés en tenant compte de certains objectifs de développement durable (ODD) des Nations Unies comme référence pour examiner les implications en termes de durabilité des transitions vers l'agroécologie. De telles implications ont été identifiées pour plusieurs ODD, notamment Faim zéro (ODD 2), Éducation de qualité (ODD 4), Consommation et production responsables (ODD 12), Action pour le climat (ODD 13) et Vie terrestre (ODD 15). Les principaux facteurs contribuant à la durabilité des transitions vers l'agroécologie sont: i) un capital social mature et une meilleure connaissance par les agriculteurs des avantages des pratiques agroécologiques; ii) des actions collaboratives et des institutions collectives renforcées pour accroître le pouvoir de négociation au sein de la chaîne de valeur; et, iii) des changements dans le comportement des consommateurs et les régimes alimentaires. Ces facteurs soulignent la nécessité d'une perspective de système alimentaire dans les transitions vers l'agroécologie et les politiques d'accompagnement. Cela met ainsi en évidence le rôle significatif de la recherche transdisciplinaire dans le renforcement de la durabilité des systèmes alimentaires européens. Ein erfolgreicher Übergang zur Agrarökologie erfordert ein gemeinsames Verständnis über die Auswirkungen auf die Nachhaltigkeit von Lebensmittelsystemen. Um ein solches Verständnis zu erlangen, wird von Geldgebenden, der Forschung und ihren Endnutzern und ‐nutzerinnenzunehmend ein transdisziplinärer Ansatz gefordert. Im Rahmen des UNISECO‐Projekts wurden transdisziplinäre Prozesse eingesetzt, um strategische Pfade zu entwickeln. Sie sollen den Übergang zur Agrarökologie in Fallstudien in ganz Europa ermöglichen. Diese strategischen Pfade wurden mit Szenarien der EU‐Lebensmittelsysteme im Jahr 2050 zusammengeführt und in Kombination mit agrarökologischen Landwirtschafts‐ und Ernährungsgewohnheiten bewertet. Als Referenz für die Diskussion der Auswirkungen auf die Nachhaltigkeit dienten ausgewählte UN‐Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung (Sustainable Development Goals, SDGs). Die Auswirkungen wurden für mehrere SDGs identifiziert, darunter Kein Hunger (SDG 2), chancengerechte und hochwertige Bildung (SDG 4), nachhaltiger Konsum und Produktion (SDG 12), Klimaschutz und Anpassung (SDG 13) und Leben an Land (SDG 15). Schlüsselfaktoren, die zur Nachhaltigkeit des Übergangs zur Agrarökologie beitragen, sind: i) gewachsenes Sozialkapital und verbessertes Wissen in der Landwirtschaft über die Vorteile agrarökologischer Verfahren; ii) verstärkte gemeinschaftliche Aktionen und kollektive Institutionen, um die Verhandlungsmacht innerhalb der Wertschöpfungskette zu erhöhen; und iii) Veränderungen im Konsumverhalten und in der Ernährung. Diese Faktoren unterstreichen die Notwendigkeit, Übergänge zur Agrarökologie und unterstützende Maßnahmen aus der Perspektive der Lebensmittelsysteme zu betrachten. Hieraus wird wiederum die bedeutende Rolle einer transdisziplinären Forschung zur Stärkung der Nachhaltigkeit europäischer Lebensmittelsysteme deutlich.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerald Schwarz & Francesco Vanni & David Miller & Janne Helin & Jaroslav Pražan & Fabrizio Albanito & Mihaela Fratila & Francesco Galioto & Oriana Gava & Katherine Irvine & Jan Landert & Alba Linares , 2022. "Exploring Sustainability Implications of Transitions to Agroecology: a Transdisciplinary Perspective," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 37-47, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:21:y:2022:i:3:p:37-47
    DOI: 10.1111/1746-692X.12377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12377
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1746-692X.12377?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Isabeau Coopmans & Joost Dessein & Francesco Accatino & Federico Antonioli & Camelia Gavrilescu & Piotr Gradziuk & Gordana Manevska‐Tasevska & Miranda Meuwissen & Mariya Peneva & Bárbara Soriano & Jul, 2020. "Policy directions to support generational renewal in European farming systems," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 19(2), pages 30-36, August.
    2. Andreas Mayer & Gerald Kalt & Lisa Kaufmann & Elin Röös & Adrian Muller & Rainer Weisshaidinger & Anita Frehner & Nicolas Roux & Pete Smith & Michaela C. Theurl & Sarah Matej & Karlheinz Erb, 2022. "Impacts of Scaling up Agroecology on the Sustainability of European Agriculture in 2050," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 27-36, December.
    3. Richard Fuchs & Calum Brown & Mark Rounsevell, 2020. "Europe’s Green Deal offshores environmental damage to other nations," Nature, Nature, vol. 586(7831), pages 671-673, October.
    4. Colin Ray Anderson & Janneke Bruil & Michael Jahi Chappell & Csilla Kiss & Michel Patrick Pimbert, 2019. "From Transition to Domains of Transformation: Getting to Sustainable and Just Food Systems through Agroecology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-28, September.
    5. Elisa Ravazzoli & Cristina Dalla Torre & Riccardo Da Re & Valentino Marini Govigli & Laura Secco & Elena Gorriz-Mifsud & Elena Pisani & Carla Barlagne & Antonio Baselice & Mohamed Bengoumi & Marijke D, 2021. "Can social innovation make a change in European and Mediterranean marginalized areas? Social innovation impact assessment in agriculture, fisheries, forestry, and rural development," DEOS Working Papers 2102, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    6. Elisa Ravazzoli & Cristina Dalla Torre & Riccardo Da Re & Valentino Marini Govigli & Laura Secco & Elena Górriz-Mifsud & Elena Pisani & Carla Barlagne & Antonio Baselice & Mohammed Bengoumi & Marijke , 2021. "Can Social Innovation Make a Change in European and Mediterranean Marginalized Areas? Social Innovation Impact Assessment in Agriculture, Fisheries, Forestry, and Rural Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-27, February.
    7. David Miller & Sophie Legras & Andrew Barnes & Mara Cazacu & Oriana Gava & Janne Helin & Katherine Irvine & Jochen Kantelhardt & Jan Landert & Laure Latruffe & Andreas Mayer & Andreas Niedermayr & And, 2022. "Creating Conditions for Harnessing the Potential of Transitions to Agroecology in Europe and Requirements for Policy," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 72-79, December.
    8. Andreas Niedermayr & Jan Landert & Fabrizio Albanito & Johannes Carolus & Yann Desjeux & Julia Heinrichs & Andrea Hrabalova & Philippe Jeanneaux & Jochen Kantelhardt & Laure Latruffe & Jürn Sanders & , 2022. "Assessing farming systems in transition to agroecology," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 48-49, December.
    9. Gianluca Brunori & Giacomo Branca & Luigi Cembalo & Marijke D’Haese & Liesbeth Dries, 2020. "Agricultural and Food Economics: the challenge of sustainability," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 8(1), pages 1-2, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Miller & Sophie Legras & Andrew Barnes & Mara Cazacu & Oriana Gava & Janne Helin & Katherine Irvine & Jochen Kantelhardt & Jan Landert & Laure Latruffe & Andreas Mayer & Andreas Niedermayr & And, 2022. "Creating Conditions for Harnessing the Potential of Transitions to Agroecology in Europe and Requirements for Policy," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 72-79, December.
    2. Katarzyna Zawalińska & Alexandra Smyrniotopoulou & Katalin Balazs & Michael Böhm & Mihai Chitea & Violeta Florian & Mihaela Fratila & Piotr Gradziuk & Stuart Henderson & Katherine Irvine & Vasilia Kon, 2022. "Advancing the Contributions of European Stakeholders in Farming Systems to Transitions to Agroecology," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 50-63, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ezio Micelli & Elena Ostanel & Luca Lazzarini, 2023. "“Wanna Be Provoked”: Inner Peripheries Generators of Social Innovation in the Italian Apennine," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-23, April.
    2. Carla Barlagne & Mariana Melnykovych & David Miller & Richard J. Hewitt & Laura Secco & Elena Pisani & Maria Nijnik, 2021. "What Are the Impacts of Social Innovation? A Synthetic Review and Case Study of Community Forestry in the Scottish Highlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, April.
    3. Alan Matthews, 2022. "Prospects for Agroecology in Europe," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 80-83, December.
    4. Ramazan Çakmakçı & Mehmet Ali Salık & Songül Çakmakçı, 2023. "Assessment and Principles of Environmentally Sustainable Food and Agriculture Systems," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-27, May.
    5. Antonio Baselice & Mariarosaria Lombardi & Maurizio Prosperi & Antonio Stasi & Antonio Lopolito, 2021. "Key Drivers of the Engagement of Farmers in Social Innovation for Marginalised Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Manfred Perlik, 2021. "Impacts of Social Innovation on Spatiality in Mountain–Lowland Relationships — Trajectories of Two Swiss Regional Initiatives in the Context of New Policy Regimes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, March.
    7. Antonio Baselice & Maurizio Prosperi & Antonio Lopolito, 2021. "A Conceptual Framework for the Evaluation of Social Agriculture: An Application to a Project Aimed at the Employability of Young People NEET," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, August.
    8. David Miller & Sophie Legras & Andrew Barnes & Mara Cazacu & Oriana Gava & Janne Helin & Katherine Irvine & Jochen Kantelhardt & Jan Landert & Laure Latruffe & Andreas Mayer & Andreas Niedermayr & And, 2022. "Creating Conditions for Harnessing the Potential of Transitions to Agroecology in Europe and Requirements for Policy," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 72-79, December.
    9. Néstor Vercher, 2022. "Territorial Social Innovation and Alternative Food Networks: The Case of a New Farmers’ Cooperative on the Island of Ibiza (Spain)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, May.
    10. Živojinović, Ivana & Rogelja, Todora & Weiss, Gerhard & Ludvig, Alice & Secco, Laura, 2023. "Institutional structures impeding forest-based social innovation in Serbia and Slovenia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    11. Néstor Vercher, 2022. "The Role of Actors in Social Innovation in Rural Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-24, May.
    12. Bill Slee & Robert Lukesch & Elisa Ravazzoli, 2022. "Social Innovation: The Promise and the Reality in Marginalised Rural Areas in Europe," World, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-23, April.
    13. Davide Dell’Unto & Gabriele Dono & Raffaele Cortignani, 2023. "Impacts of Environmental Targets on the Livestock Sector: An Assessment Tool Applied to Italy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, March.
    14. Dalal Aassouli & Ayodele Akande & Ray Jureidini, 2023. "Comparative Analysis of Sustainable Food Governance and the Alignment of Food Security Policies to Sustainable Development: A Case Study of OIC Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-27, November.
    15. Laure Latruffe & Gerald Schwarz, 2022. "Insights on Transitions to Agroecological Farming from across Europe," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 3-4, December.
    16. Britz, Wolfgang & Li, Jingwen & Shang, Linmei, 2021. "Combining large-scale sensitivity analysis in Computable General Equilibrium models with Machine Learning: An Example Application to policy supporting the bio-economy," Conference papers 333285, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    17. Manuel González-Rosado & Luis Parras-Alcántara & Jesús Aguilera-Huertas & Beatriz Lozano-García, 2021. "Building an Agroecological Process towards Agricultural Sustainability: A Case Study from Southern Spain," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.
    18. Fabíola Sostmeyer Polita & Lívia Madureira, 2021. "Transition Pathways of Agroecological Innovation in Portugal’s Douro Wine Region. A Multi-Level Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-20, March.
    19. Tomasi Sabrina & Cavicchi Alessio & Aleffi Chiara & Paviotti Gigliola & Ferrara Concetta & Baldoni Federica & Passarini Paolo, 2021. "Civic universities and bottom-up approaches to boost local development of rural areas: the case of the University of Macerata," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, December.
    20. Patrick Baur, 2020. "When farmers are pulled in too many directions: comparing institutional drivers of food safety and environmental sustainability in California agriculture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(4), pages 1175-1194, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:21:y:2022:i:3:p:37-47. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.