IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ehsrev/v47y1994i2p262-287.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tired pioneers and dynamic newcomers? A comparative essay on English and German entrepreneurial history, 1870-1914

Author

Listed:
  • H. BERGHOFF
  • R. MÖLLER

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • H. Berghoff & R. Möller, 1994. "Tired pioneers and dynamic newcomers? A comparative essay on English and German entrepreneurial history, 1870-1914," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 47(2), pages 262-287, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ehsrev:v:47:y:1994:i:2:p:262-287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1468-0289.1994.tb01376.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Howe, Anthony, 1984. "The Cotton Masters 1830-1860," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198218944.
    2. Leslie Hannah, 1976. "Introduction: Business Development and Economic Structure in Britain since 1880," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Leslie Hannah (ed.), Management Strategy and Business Development, pages 1-19, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. André Pahnke & Friederike Welter, 2019. "The German Mittelstand: antithesis to Silicon Valley entrepreneurship?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 345-358, February.
    2. Nicholas, Tom, 1998. "Clogs to clogs in three generations? Explaining entrepreneurial performance in Britain since 1850," Economic History Working Papers 22395, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Toms, Steven, 2017. "Network preferences and the growth of the British cotton textile industry, c.1780-1914," MPRA Paper 80058, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Robin Pearson, 1993. "Taking risks and containing competition: diversification and oligopoly in the fire insurance markets of the north of England during the early nineteenth century," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 46(1), pages 39-64, February.
    3. Douglas W. Allen & Yoram Barzel, 2007. "The Evolution of Criminal Law and Police," Working Papers UWEC-2008-01, University of Washington, Department of Economics.
    4. Stana Nenadic, 1991. "Businessmen, the urban middle classes, and the ‘dominance’of manufacturers in nineteenth-centuy Britain," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 44(1), pages 66-85, February.
    5. Toms, Steven & Shepherd, Alice, 2017. "Accounting and social conflict: Profit and regulated working time in the British Industrial Revolution," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 57-75.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ehsrev:v:47:y:1994:i:2:p:262-287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.