IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/canjag/v67y2019i4p363-377.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nontariff measures and product differentiation: Hormone‐treated beef trade from the United States and Canada to the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • Byung Min Soon
  • Wyatt Thompson

Abstract

We investigate how a combination of the sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) measure and product differentiation affects beef trade and the consequences for the United States (US)–European Union (EU) hormone‐treated beef trade dispute. We develop a partial equilibrium model to represent the global beef markets and product differentiation between non‐hormone‐treated beef, hormone‐treated beef, and other beef. The results show that removing the SPS measure increases EU hormone‐treated beef imports from the US and Canada and decrease beef consumption. In addition, EU hormone‐treated beef consumption and imports can be related to a few key indicators of product differentiation. The framework we develop can estimate EU hormone‐treated beef consumption and imports based on a minimum of parameters relating to product differentiation, thereby providing useful applied economic analysis of a key trade measure. Nous étudions comment une combinaison des mesures sanitaires et phytosanitaires (SPS) et la différenciation des produits affectent le commerce du bœuf et ses conséquences pour le différend commercial entre l'European Union et les États‐Unis concernant le bœuf traité aux hormones. Nous développons un modèle d'équilibre partiel pour représenter le marché mondial du bœuf et la différenciation des produits entre le bœuf non‐traité aux hormones, le bœuf traité aux hormones et les autres types de bœufs. Les résultats montrent que la suppression de la mesure SPS augmente les importations de bœuf traité aux hormones de l'UE en provenance des États‐Unis et du Canada et diminue la consommation de bœuf. De plus, la consommation et les importations de viande bovine traitée aux hormones dans l'UE peuvent être liées à quelques indicateurs clés de différenciation des produits. Le cadre que nous développons permet d'estimer la consommation et les importations de bœuf traité aux hormones dans l'UE sur la base d'un minimum de paramètres relatifs à la différenciation des produits, fournissant ainsi une analyse économique appliquée utile d'une mesure commerciale clé.

Suggested Citation

  • Byung Min Soon & Wyatt Thompson, 2019. "Nontariff measures and product differentiation: Hormone‐treated beef trade from the United States and Canada to the European Union," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 67(4), pages 363-377, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:canjag:v:67:y:2019:i:4:p:363-377
    DOI: 10.1111/cjag.12200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12200
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/cjag.12200?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daria Loginova & Marco Portmann & Martin Huber, 2021. "Assessing the Effects of Seasonal Tariff‐rate Quotas on Vegetable Prices in Switzerland," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(2), pages 607-627, June.
    2. Kelvin Balcombe & Dylan Bradley & Iain Fraser, 2020. "The Economic Analysis of Consumer Attitudes Towards Food Produced Using Prohibited Production Methods: Do Consumers Really Care?," Studies in Economics 2004, School of Economics, University of Kent.
    3. Kelvin Balcombe & Dylan Bradley & Iain Fraser, 2021. "Do Consumers Really Care? An Economic Analysis of Consumer Attitudes Towards Food Produced Using Prohibited Production Methods," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(2), pages 452-469, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:canjag:v:67:y:2019:i:4:p:363-377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caefmea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.