IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v14y2005i4p230-240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

CSOs and business partnerships: strategies for interaction

Author

Listed:
  • Jenny Ählström
  • Emma Sjöström

Abstract

Cross‐sectoral partnerships have increasingly been promoted as a solution to environmental and social problems. This presupposes participation of civil society organizations (CSOs). The article probes whether the partnership idea is prevailing among CSOs. The purpose of the study is to explore what underlies CSOs' approaches to interaction with business. The study finds that, based on their background and tactics for business interaction, CSOs can be divided into Preservers, Protesters, Modifiers and Scrutinizers. Among these, solely the Preservers have a strategy of engaging in partnerships with business. The Protesters, Modifiers and Scrutinizers, on the other hand, take on a strategy of independence. This finding indicates that corporations that seek to successfully partner with CSOs should be wary that such collaboration is not in line with the strategy of all CSOs, and that for the same reasons the prevailing partnership promotion might be problematic. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Jenny Ählström & Emma Sjöström, 2005. "CSOs and business partnerships: strategies for interaction," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(4), pages 230-240, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:14:y:2005:i:4:p:230-240
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.470
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.470
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.470?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cathy L. Hartman & Peter S. Hofman & Edwin R. Stafford, 1999. "Partnerships: a path to sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(5), pages 255-266, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jon Burchell & Joanne Cook, 2013. "Sleeping with the Enemy? Strategic Transformations in Business–NGO Relationships Through Stakeholder Dialogue," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 113(3), pages 505-518, March.
    2. Uwafiokun Idemudia, 2017. "Environmental Business–NGO Partnerships in Nigeria: Issues and Prospects," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 265-276, February.
    3. Ramendra Singh & Madhupa Bakshi & Prashant Mishra, 2015. "Corporate Social Responsibility: Linking Bottom of the Pyramid to Market Development?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(2), pages 361-373, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kourula, Arno, 2010. "Corporate engagement with non-governmental organizations in different institutional contexts--A case study of a forest products company," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 395-404, October.
    2. Andrew Peterman & Arno Kourula & Raymond Levitt, 2020. "Organizational roles in a sustainability alliance network," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3314-3330, December.
    3. Lea Fobbe, 2020. "Analysing Organisational Collaboration Practices for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Minna Halme, 2001. "Learning for sustainable development in tourism networks," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(2), pages 100-114, March.
    5. Tulin Dzhengiz, 2020. "A Literature Review of Inter-Organizational Sustainability Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-52, June.
    6. Thomas P. Seager, 2008. "The sustainability spectrum and the sciences of sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(7), pages 444-453, November.
    7. Tibebe Sirak Asfaw & Vida Botes & Lula G. Mengesha, 2017. "The role of NGOs in corporate environmental responsibility practice: evidence from Ethiopia," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 1-9, December.
    8. Enrico Fontana, 2018. "Corporate Social Responsibility as Stakeholder Engagement: Firm–NGO Collaboration in Sweden," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(4), pages 327-338, July.
    9. Yevhen Baranchenko & David Oglethorpe, 2012. "The Potential Environmental Benefits of Co‐Operative Businesses Within the Climate Change Agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 197-210, March.
    10. Peter S. Hofman, 2008. "Governance for Green Electrity: Formation of Rules between Market and Hierarchy," Energy & Environment, , vol. 19(6), pages 803-817, November.
    11. Uwafiokun Idemudia, 2017. "Environmental Business–NGO Partnerships in Nigeria: Issues and Prospects," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 265-276, February.
    12. Kalim U. Shah, 2011. "Organizational Legitimacy and the Strategic Bridging Ability of Green Alliances," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(8), pages 498-511, December.
    13. Juan Pablo Valbuena‐Hernandez & Natalia Ortiz‐de‐Mandojana, 2022. "Encouraging corporate sustainability through effective strategic partnerships," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 124-134, January.
    14. Samuel Adomako & Mai Dong Tran, 2022. "Environmental collaboration, responsible innovation, and firm performance: The moderating role of stakeholder pressure," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1695-1704, May.
    15. Tulin Dzhengiz, 2018. "The Relationship of Organisational Value Frames with the Configuration of Alliance Portfolios: Cases from Electricity Utilities in Great Britain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-29, November.
    16. Marileena Koskela & Jarmo Vehmas, 2012. "Defining Eco‐efficiency: A Case Study on the Finnish Forest Industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(8), pages 546-566, December.
    17. Fredrik von Malmborg, 2004. "Networking for knowledge transfer: towards an understanding of local authority roles in regional industrial ecosystem management," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(5), pages 334-346, September.
    18. Peter S. Hofman & Bin Wu & Kaiming Liu, 2014. "Collaborative Socially Responsible Practices for Improving the Position of Chinese Workers in Global Supply Chains," Journal of Current Chinese Affairs - China aktuell, Institute of Asian Studies, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 43(4), pages 111-141.
    19. Brody, Samuel D. & Cash, Sean B. & Dyke, Jennifer & Thornton, Sara, 2006. "Motivations for the forestry industry to participate in collaborative ecosystem management initiatives," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 123-134, March.
    20. Belén Payán‐Sánchez & Miguel Pérez‐Valls & José Antonio Plaza‐Úbeda & Diego Vázquez‐Brust, 2022. "Network ambidexterity and environmental performance: Code‐sharing in the airline industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1169-1183, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:14:y:2005:i:4:p:230-240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.