IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v74y2018i1p229-238.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

FPCA†based method to select optimal sampling schedules that capture between†subject variability in longitudinal studies

Author

Listed:
  • Meihua Wu
  • Ana Diez†Roux
  • Trivellore E. Raghunathan
  • Brisa N. Sánchez

Abstract

A critical component of longitudinal study design involves determining the sampling schedule. Criteria for optimal design often focus on accurate estimation of the mean profile, although capturing the between†subject variance of the longitudinal process is also important since variance patterns may be associated with covariates of interest or predict future outcomes. Existing design approaches have limited applicability when one wishes to optimize sampling schedules to capture between†individual variability. We propose an approach to derive optimal sampling schedules based on functional principal component analysis (FPCA), which separately characterizes the mean and the variability of longitudinal profiles and leads to a parsimonious representation of the temporal pattern of the variability. Simulation studies show that the new design approach performs equally well compared to an existing approach based on parametric mixed model (PMM) when a PMM is adequate for the data, and outperforms the PMM†based approach otherwise. We use the methods to design studies aiming to characterize daily salivary cortisol profiles and identify the optimal days within the menstrual cycle when urinary progesterone should be measured.

Suggested Citation

  • Meihua Wu & Ana Diez†Roux & Trivellore E. Raghunathan & Brisa N. Sánchez, 2018. "FPCA†based method to select optimal sampling schedules that capture between†subject variability in longitudinal studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 229-238, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:74:y:2018:i:1:p:229-238
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.12714
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.12714
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.12714?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hao Ji & Hans-Georg Müller, 2017. "Optimal designs for longitudinal and functional data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(3), pages 859-876, June.
    2. Lan Zhou & Jianhua Z. Huang & Raymond J. Carroll, 2008. "Joint modelling of paired sparse functional data using principal components," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 95(3), pages 601-619.
    3. Jonathan R. Stroud & Peter Müller & Gary L. Rosner, 2001. "Optimal sampling times in population pharmacokinetic studies," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 50(3), pages 345-359.
    4. Raymond J. Carroll, 2003. "Variances Are Not Always Nuisance Parameters," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(2), pages 211-220, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rha, Hyungmin & Kao, Ming-Hung & Pan, Rong, 2020. "Design optimal sampling plans for functional regression models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pourahmadi, Mohsen & Daniels, Michael J. & Park, Trevor, 2007. "Simultaneous modelling of the Cholesky decomposition of several covariance matrices," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 568-587, March.
    2. Park, So Young & Xiao, Luo & Willbur, Jayson D. & Staicu, Ana-Maria & Jumbe, N. L’ntshotsholé, 2018. "A joint design for functional data with application to scheduling ultrasound scans," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 101-114.
    3. Feng, Sanying & Lian, Heng & Xue, Liugen, 2016. "A new nested Cholesky decomposition and estimation for the covariance matrix of bivariate longitudinal data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 98-109.
    4. Berrendero, José R. & Bueno-Larraz, Beatriz & Cuevas, Antonio, 2019. "An RKHS model for variable selection in functional linear regression," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 25-45.
    5. Raymond J. Carroll & Douglas Midthune & Laurence S. Freedman & Victor Kipnis, 2006. "Seemingly Unrelated Measurement Error Models, with Application to Nutritional Epidemiology," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(1), pages 75-84, March.
    6. Jay Verkuilen & Michael Smithson, 2012. "Mixed and Mixture Regression Models for Continuous Bounded Responses Using the Beta Distribution," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 37(1), pages 82-113, February.
    7. You-Gan Wang & Yuning Zhao, 2007. "A Modified Pseudolikelihood Approach for Analysis of Longitudinal Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(3), pages 681-689, September.
    8. Yixin Fang & Heng Lian & Hua Liang, 2018. "A generalized partially linear framework for variance functions," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 70(5), pages 1147-1175, October.
    9. Dehideniya, Mahasen B. & Drovandi, Christopher C. & McGree, James M., 2018. "Optimal Bayesian design for discriminating between models with intractable likelihoods in epidemiology," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 277-297.
    10. Cong Han & Kathryn Chaloner, 2004. "Bayesian Experimental Design for Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Models with Application to HIV Dynamics," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 60(1), pages 25-33, March.
    11. Ziyue Liu & Anne R. Cappola & Leslie J. Crofford & Wensheng Guo, 2014. "Modeling Bivariate Longitudinal Hormone Profiles by Hierarchical State Space Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(505), pages 108-118, March.
    12. Haocheng Li & John Staudenmayer & Raymond J. Carroll, 2014. "Hierarchical functional data with mixed continuous and binary measurements," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(4), pages 802-811, December.
    13. Guo You Qin & Zhong Yi Zhu, 2009. "Robustified Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Generalized Partial Linear Mixed Model for Longitudinal Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(1), pages 52-59, March.
    14. Kyunghee Han & Pantelis Z Hadjipantelis & Jane-Ling Wang & Michael S Kramer & Seungmi Yang & Richard M Martin & Hans-Georg Müller, 2018. "Functional principal component analysis for identifying multivariate patterns and archetypes of growth, and their association with long-term cognitive development," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Gertheiss, Jan & Goldsmith, Jeff & Staicu, Ana-Maria, 2017. "A note on modeling sparse exponential-family functional response curves," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 46-52.
    16. Bailey, Natalia & Pesaran, M. Hashem & Smith, L. Vanessa, 2019. "A multiple testing approach to the regularisation of large sample correlation matrices," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 208(2), pages 507-534.
    17. Mengmeng Guo & Lhan Zhou & Jianhua Z. Huang & Wolfgang Karl Härdle, 2013. "Functional Data Analysis of Generalized Quantile Regressions," SFB 649 Discussion Papers SFB649DP2013-001, Sonderforschungsbereich 649, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
    18. Carmen D. Tekwe & Roger S. Zoh & Fuller W. Bazer & Guoyao Wu & Raymond J. Carroll, 2018. "Functional multiple indicators, multiple causes measurement error models," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 127-134, March.
    19. Lihui Zhao & Tom Chen & Vladimir Novitsky & Rui Wang, 2021. "Joint penalized spline modeling of multivariate longitudinal data, with application to HIV‐1 RNA load levels and CD4 cell counts," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(3), pages 1061-1074, September.
    20. Yiyun Shou & Michael Smithson, 2015. "Evaluating Predictors of Dispersion: A Comparison of Dominance Analysis and Bayesian Model Averaging," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(1), pages 236-256, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:74:y:2018:i:1:p:229-238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.