IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v61y2005i4p1010-1017.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling Animals' Behavioral Response by Markov Chain Models for Capture–Recapture Experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Hsin-Chou Yang
  • Anne Chao

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Hsin-Chou Yang & Anne Chao, 2005. "Modeling Animals' Behavioral Response by Markov Chain Models for Capture–Recapture Experiments," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(4), pages 1010-1017, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:61:y:2005:i:4:p:1010-1017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00372.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anne Chao & Wenten Chu & Chiu-Hsieh Hsu, 2000. "Capture–Recapture When Time and Behavioral Response Affect Capture Probabilities," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(2), pages 427-433, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Francesco Bartolucci & Fulvia Pennoni, 2007. "A Class of Latent Markov Models for Capture–Recapture Data Allowing for Time, Heterogeneity, and Behavior Effects," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(2), pages 568-578, June.
    2. Danilo Alunni Fegatelli & Luca Tardella, 2016. "Flexible behavioral capture–recapture modeling," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 72(1), pages 125-135, March.
    3. J. Andrew Royle, 2009. "Analysis of Capture–Recapture Models with Individual Covariates Using Data Augmentation," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(1), pages 267-274, March.
    4. Alessio Farcomeni, 2015. "Latent class recapture models with flexible behavioural response," Statistica, Department of Statistics, University of Bologna, vol. 75(1), pages 5-17.
    5. Yauck, Mamadou & Rivest, Louis-Paul, 2019. "On the estimation of population sizes in capture–recapture experiments," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 512-524.
    6. Linda Altieri & Alessio Farcomeni & Danilo Alunni Fegatelli, 2023. "Continuous time‐interaction processes for population size estimation, with an application to drug dealing in Italy," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 1254-1267, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chatterjee Kiranmoy & Mukherjee Diganta, 2020. "Identifying the Direction of Behavioral Dependence in Two-Sample Capture-Recapture Study," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 36(1), pages 25-48, March.
    2. Jason M. Sutherland & Carl James Schwarz & Louis-Paul Rivest, 2007. "Multilist Population Estimation with Incomplete and Partial Stratification," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(3), pages 910-916, September.
    3. Danilo Fegatelli & Luca Tardella, 2013. "Improved inference on capture recapture models with behavioural effects," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 22(1), pages 45-66, March.
    4. Yang Liu & Yukun Liu & Yan Fan & Han Geng, 2018. "Likelihood ratio confidence interval for the abundance under binomial detectability models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 81(5), pages 549-568, July.
    5. Danilo Alunni Fegatelli & Luca Tardella, 2016. "Flexible behavioral capture–recapture modeling," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 72(1), pages 125-135, March.
    6. Matthew R. Schofield & Richard J. Barker & William A. Link & Heloise Pavanato, 2023. "Estimating population size: The importance of model and estimator choice," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3803-3817, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:61:y:2005:i:4:p:1010-1017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.