IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ausact/v28y2018i1p4-13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transitioning to IFRS in Japan: Corporate Perceptions of Costs and Benefits

Author

Listed:
  • Chikako Ozu
  • Miho Nakamura
  • Kyoko Nagata
  • Sidney J. Gray

Abstract

This paper examines the ongoing transition to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in Japan with a particular focus on recent institutional developments and corporate concerns. While Japan has committed to the convergence of Japanese generally accepted accounting principles (J†GAAP) with IFRS it has not as yet formally adopted IFRS. This paper reports on Japanese corporate perceptions of the likely costs and benefits of adopting and implementing IFRS using survey data collected from senior financial executives of 292 Japanese listed companies in 2013–14. Our findings reveal that Japanese companies identify a number of major areas of general concern with the adoption and implementation of IFRS. Most importantly, uncertainty regarding the interpretation of standards followed by staff training, IT systems, technical knowledge and differences between J†GAAP and IFRS were reported as major concerns. Our survey also highlights that revenue recognition, depreciation, consolidated financial statements, financial statement presentation and the retrospective application of IFRS were viewed as key IFRS accounting issues. While the large majority of companies expected a moderate degree of benefits to arise from IFRS, substantial benefits were perceived more likely to apply to large and overseas listed companies mainly arising from improvements in the international comparability of financial statements.

Suggested Citation

  • Chikako Ozu & Miho Nakamura & Kyoko Nagata & Sidney J. Gray, 2018. "Transitioning to IFRS in Japan: Corporate Perceptions of Costs and Benefits," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(1), pages 4-13, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:28:y:2018:i:1:p:4-13
    DOI: 10.1111/auar.12168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12168
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/auar.12168?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benston, George J. & Bromwich, Michael & Litan, Robert E. & Wagenhofer, Alfred, 2006. "Worldwide Financial Reporting: The Development and Future of Accounting Standards," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195305838.
    2. Stewart Jones & Alison D. Higgins, 2006. "Australia's switch to international financial reporting standards: a perspective from account preparers," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 46(4), pages 629-652, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cynthia W. Cai & Martina K. Linnenluecke & Mauricio Marrone & Abhay K. Singh, 2019. "Machine Learning and Expert Judgement: Analyzing Emerging Topics in Accounting and Finance Research in the Asia–Pacific," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 55(4), pages 709-733, December.
    2. Jude Edeigba & Christopher Gan & Felix Amenkhienan, 2020. "The influence of cultural diversity on the convergence of IFRS: evidence from Nigeria IFRS implementation," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 105-121, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Georgieva, Daniela & Georgieva, Teodora, 2020. "A study of social policies based on the example of the Bulgarian hotels on the Black Sea coast," MPRA Paper 105291, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2020.
    2. Philip Brown & Ann Tarca, 2007. "Achieving High Quality, Comparable Financial Reporting: A Review of Independent Enforcement Bodies in Australia and the United Kingdom," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 43(4), pages 438-473, December.
    3. Robert K. Larson & Paul J. Herz, 2013. "A Multi-Issue/Multi-Period Analysis of the Geographic Diversity of IASB Comment Letter Participation," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 99-151, June.
    4. George J. Benston & Michael Bromwich & Alfred Wagenhofer, 2006. "Principles‐ versus rules‐based accounting standards: the FASB's standard setting strategy," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 42(2), pages 165-188, June.
    5. Francesco De Luca & Jenice Prather-Kinsey, 2018. "Legitimacy theory may explain the failure of global adoption of IFRS: the case of Europe and the U.S," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 22(3), pages 501-534, September.
    6. John Goodwin & Barry J. Cooper & Shireenjit Johl, 2008. "How Prepared was Australia for International Financial Reporting Standards? The Case of Listed Firms," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 18(1), pages 35-45, March.
    7. Tudor Liviu-Alexandru, 2018. "The Impact Of Ifrs Adoption In Emerging Economies," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 6, pages 152-157, December.
    8. Philip D. Palmer, 2008. "Disclosure of the impacts of adopting Australian equivalents of International Financial Reporting Standards," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 48(5), pages 847-870, December.
    9. Martin Bugeja & Meiting Lu & Yaowen Shan, 2015. "Cost Stickiness in Australia: Characteristics and Determinants," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 25(3), pages 248-261, September.
    10. repec:mth:ijafr8:v:8:y:2018:i:2:p:26-46 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Jessica Dye & Aaron Gilbert & Gail Pacheco, 2017. "Does integration lead to lower costs of equity?," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 42(1), pages 86-112, February.
    12. Jones, Stewart & Finley, Aimee, 2011. "Have IFRS made a difference to intra-country financial reporting diversity?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 22-38.
    13. Silvia Ferramosca & Giulio Greco & Marco Allegrini, 2017. "External audit and goodwill write-off," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 21(4), pages 907-934, December.
    14. Goodwin, John & Ahmed, Kamran & Heaney, Richard, 2008. "The Effects of International Financial Reporting Standards on the Accounts and Accounting Quality of Australian Firms: A Retrospective Study," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 89-119.
    15. Walker, Martin, 2010. "Accounting for varieties of capitalism: The case against a single set of global accounting standards," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 137-152.
    16. Uyar, Ali & Güngörmüş, Ali Haydar, 2013. "Perceptions and knowledge of accounting professionals on IFRS for SMEs: Evidence from Turkey," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 77-87.
    17. Mustata Razvan V. & Matis Dumitru, 2009. "From The Harmonization Need To The Spontaneous Accounting Harmonization," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3(1), pages 1067-1071, May.
    18. Esther Cheung & James Lau, 2016. "Readability of Notes to the Financial Statements and the Adoption of IFRS," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 26(2), pages 162-176, June.
    19. Sugiyama, Sachiko & Islam, Jesmin, 2016. "Empirical findings from the reconciliations in the first IFRS compliant reports prepared by Japanese-owned subsidiaries in Australia," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 143-158.
    20. Cheng Lai & Meiting Lu & Yaowen Shan, 2013. "Has Australian financial reporting become more conservative over time?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 53(3), pages 731-761, September.
    21. Yanqi Sun & Jenny Jing Wang & Kevin Tairan Huang, 2022. "Does IFRS and GRI adoption impact the understandability of corporate reports by Chinese listed companies?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(2), pages 2879-2904, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ausact:v:28:y:2018:i:1:p:4-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1035-6908 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.