IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/agecon/v15y1996i1p17-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Production efficiency of Chinese agriculture: evidence from rural household survey data

Author

Listed:
  • Jirong Wang
  • Gail L. Cramer
  • Eric J. Wailes

Abstract

A shadow‐price profit frontier model is developed to examine production efficiency of Chinese rural households in farming operations. The model incorporates price distortions resulting from imperfect market conditions and socioeconomic and institutional constraints, but retains the advantages of stochastic frontier properties. The shadow prices are derived through a generalized profit function estimation. The shadow‐price profit frontier is then estimated and an efficiency index based on the estimated profit frontier is computed and decomposed to household characteristics. Empirical results using data from China's Rural Household Survey for 1991 reject the neoclassical profit maximization hypothesis based on market prices in favor of the general model with price distortions. Farmers' resource endowment and education influence their response to the market restrictions, thus alter their performance in terms of efficiency. The estimated efficiency index ranges from 6% to 93% with a sample average of 62%. Households' educational level, family size and per capita net income are positively related to production efficiency. Households living in mountain areas or with family members employed by the government or state industries are relatively inefficient. Reducing market intervention, allowing right of use of farm land to be transferred among households, encouraging migration of excess farm labor, and promoting farmers' education will improve rural households' efficiency in agricultural production.

Suggested Citation

  • Jirong Wang & Gail L. Cramer & Eric J. Wailes, 1996. "Production efficiency of Chinese agriculture: evidence from rural household survey data," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 15(1), pages 17-28, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:15:y:1996:i:1:p:17-28
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.1996.tb00417.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.1996.tb00417.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1574-0862.1996.tb00417.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:15:y:1996:i:1:p:17-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.