IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/agecon/v10y1994i3p307-316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Asymmetry in beef, lamb and pork farm‐retail price transmission in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • G.R. Griffith
  • N.E. Piggott

Abstract

The hypothesis of asymmetry in price transmission within the Australian meat market is tested using monthly data for beef, lamb and pork prices at different market levels over the period 1971–1988. The results indicate that asymmetrical price response is a strategy used by beef and lamb retailers and wholesalers to adjust to changing input prices, but not by pork retailers and wholesalers. This difference is perhaps unexpected given the similarity in behaviours relating to price levelling in this market, the high cross‐price elasticities of demand between these meats, and the relatively greater degree of concentration in the pork market.

Suggested Citation

  • G.R. Griffith & N.E. Piggott, 1994. "Asymmetry in beef, lamb and pork farm‐retail price transmission in Australia," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 10(3), pages 307-316, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:10:y:1994:i:3:p:307-316
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.1994.tb00311.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.1994.tb00311.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1574-0862.1994.tb00311.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:agecon:v:10:y:1994:i:3:p:307-316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.