IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/abacus/v41y2005i2p138-158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Professional Accounting Standards and the Public Sector—a Mismatch

Author

Listed:
  • Allan Barton

Abstract

Professional accounting standards have been applied to the public sector in Australia as part of the process of adopting accrual accounting. However, the reason given for their application to the public sector is questionable. The modes of operation of governments and of the business sector are very different, and accounting standards must be tailored to suit the specific information needs of each sector for the accounting systems to provide relevant information. The four Accounting Concepts Statements and the broad requirements of AAS 29 and AAS 31 are examined to show where changes are needed in the standards to make their information more relevant to the needs of the public sector. These changes would better enable accrual accounting information systems to assist in enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of public sector operations and the accountability of governments to parliament and citizens.

Suggested Citation

  • Allan Barton, 2005. "Professional Accounting Standards and the Public Sector—a Mismatch," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 41(2), pages 138-158, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:abacus:v:41:y:2005:i:2:p:138-158
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2005.00173.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2005.00173.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2005.00173.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Graeme W. Dean & Frank L. Clarke, 2003. "An Evolving Conceptual Framework?," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 39(3), pages 279-297, October.
    2. Robert R. Sterling, 2003. "A Patch on GAAP," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 39(3), pages 1-1, October.
    3. Mark Christensen, 2003. "Without `Reinventing the Wheel‘: Business Accounting Applied to the Public Sector," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 13(30), pages 22-27, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yeny Andriani & Ralph Kober & Juliana Ng, 2010. "Decision Usefulness of Cash and Accrual Information: Public Sector Managers’ Perceptions," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 20(2), pages 144-153, June.
    2. Allan Barton, 2009. "The Use and Abuse of Accounting in the Public Sector Financial Management Reform Program in Australia," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 45(2), pages 221-248, June.
    3. Allan Barton, 2007. "Accrual Accounting and Budgeting Systems Issues in Australian Governments — a Rejoinder," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 17(43), pages 75-84, November.
    4. Mari Kobayashi & Kiyoshi Yamamoto & Keiko Ishikawa, 2016. "The Usefulness of Accrual Information in Non‐mandatory Environments: The Case of Japanese Local Government," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 26(2), pages 153-161, June.
    5. Oulasvirta Lasse Olavi, 2014. "Governmental Financial Accounting and European Harmonisation: Case Study of Finland," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 4(3), pages 1-27, December.
    6. Oulasvirta, Lasse, 2014. "The reluctance of a developed country to choose International Public Sector Accounting Standards of the IFAC. A critical case study," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 272-285.
    7. Anita Golovkova, 2020. "IFRS implementation in healthcare facilities in the United Kingdom: (un)intended effects [Implementace IFRS ve zdravotnických zařízeních ve Velké Británii – (ne)zamyšlené dopady]," Český finanční a účetní časopis, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2020(3-4).
    8. Lynch, Barbara, 2010. "An examination of environmental reporting by Australian state government departments," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 32-45.
    9. Zubir Azhar & Ervina Alfan & Krishnen Kishan & Nurul Husna Assanah, 2022. "Accrual Accounting at Different Levels of the Public Sector: A Systematic Literature Review," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(1), pages 36-62, March.
    10. Sheila Ellwood, 2008. "Accounting for Public Hospitals: A Case Study of Modified GAAP," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 44(4), pages 399-422, December.
    11. Fawzi Laswad & Nives Botica Redmayne, 2015. "IPSAS or IFRS as the Framework for Public Sector Financial Reporting? New Zealand Preparers’ Perspectives," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 25(2), pages 175-184, June.
    12. Weetman, Pauline, 2006. "Discovering the ‘international’ in accounting and finance," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 351-370.
    13. Javed Miraj & Zhuquan Wang, 2021. "Factors Influencing the Implementation of International Public Sector Accounting Standards in Pakistan," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, July.
    14. Ralph Kober & Janet Lee & Juliana Ng, 2013. "GAAP, GFS and AASB 1049: perceptions of public sector stakeholders," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 53(2), pages 471-496, June.
    15. Allan Barton, 2007. "Accrual Accounting and Budgeting Systems Issues in Australian Governments," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 17(41), pages 38-50, March.
    16. Malcolm Abbott & Angela Tan†Kantor, 2018. "Fair Value Measurement and Mandated Accounting Changes: The Case of the Victorian Rail Track Corporation," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(2), pages 266-278, June.
    17. Christian Nitzl & Dennis Hilgers & Bernhard Hirsch & David Lindermüller, 2020. "The Influence of the Organizational Structure, Environment, and Resource Provision on the Use of Accrual Accounting in Municipalities," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 72(2), pages 271-298, April.
    18. Mark Christensen, 2007. "What We Might Know (But Aren't Sure) About Public-Sector Accrual Accounting," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 17(41), pages 51-65, March.
    19. Allan Barton, 2010. "Commentary: IFRS and the Domestic Standard Setter – The Challenge of the Public Sector," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 20(4), pages 403-406, December.
    20. Sheila Ellwood & Susan Newberry, 2016. "New development: The conceptual underpinnings of international public sector accounting," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(3), pages 231-234, April.
    21. Anita Golovkova, 2020. "IFRS implementation in healthcare facilities in the United Kingdom: (un)intended effects [Implementace IFRS ve zdravotnických zařízeních ve Velké Británii - (ne)zamyšlené dopady]," Český finanční a účetní časopis, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2020(3-4), pages 53-70.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David B. Sutton & Carolyn J. Cordery & Tony Zijl, 2015. "The Purpose of Financial Reporting: The Case for Coherence in the Conceptual Framework and Standards," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 51(1), pages 116-141, March.
    2. Zubir Azhar & Ervina Alfan & Krishnen Kishan & Nurul Husna Assanah, 2022. "Accrual Accounting at Different Levels of the Public Sector: A Systematic Literature Review," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(1), pages 36-62, March.
    3. Louise Kl00t, 2006. "Budget Reporting in Local Government: Problem or Solution?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 16(40), pages 72-81, November.
    4. Allan Barton, 2009. "The Use and Abuse of Accounting in the Public Sector Financial Management Reform Program in Australia," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 45(2), pages 221-248, June.
    5. Josette Caruana,, 2017. "Reform for reform's sake: A never-ending story of governmental accounting change," Business and Economic Horizons (BEH), Prague Development Center, vol. 13(5), pages 676-705, December.
    6. Malcolm Anderson, 2004. "Accounting history publications 2003," Accounting History Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 209-215.
    7. Sheila Ellwood & Sue Newbury, 2006. "A bridge too far: a common conceptual framework for commercial and public benefit entities," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 19-32.
    8. Michael Bromwich & Richard Macve & Shyam Sunder, 2010. "Hicksian Income in the Conceptual Framework," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 46(3), pages 348-376, September.
    9. Elaine Stewart & Ciaran Connolly, 2021. "Recent UK Central Government Accounting Reforms: Claimed Benefits and Experienced Outcomes," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 57(3), pages 557-592, September.
    10. El-Tawy, Nevine & Tollington, Tony, 2013. "Some thoughts on the recognition of assets, notably in respect of intangible assets," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 67-80.
    11. Allan Barton, 2007. "Accrual Accounting and Budgeting Systems Issues in Australian Governments," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 17(41), pages 38-50, March.
    12. Graeme Dean, 2008. "Editorial," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 44(3), pages 1-1, September.
    13. Parmod Chand & Lorne Cummings, 2008. "The Political and Unstable Nature of the IASB's ‘Stable Platform’: Post-Convergence Australian Experience," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 18(3), pages 175-184, September.
    14. Rolf Uwe Fülbier & Joerg‐Markus Hitz & Thorsten Sellhorn, 2009. "Relevance of Academic Research and Researchers' Role in the IASB's Financial Reporting Standard Setting," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 45(4), pages 455-492, December.
    15. Ralph Kober & Janet Lee & Juliana Ng, 2013. "GAAP, GFS and AASB 1049: perceptions of public sector stakeholders," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 53(2), pages 471-496, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:abacus:v:41:y:2005:i:2:p:138-158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0001-3072 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.