IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjz/ajisjr/2521.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

International Cooperation for Peace? Development of a Conceptual Proposal

Author

Listed:
  • Mariangela Rueda-Fiorentino
  • Silvana Insignares-Cera

Abstract

The subject of peace assumes a pivotal role within both the realm of literature and the ambit of collaborative initiatives. Nevertheless, a discerning examination of the distinct sphere termed "peace cooperation" exposes a lacuna in its theoretical underpinnings and nuanced connotations, as per the Sartorian conceptual framework. The prevailing focus in scholarly investigations on cooperation predominantly centers on scrutinizing processes and dynamics associated with "development cooperation," relegating the discourse on peace to a tangential position. Considering this, the inquiry arises: What constitutes the conceptual understanding of "peace cooperation" within academic discourse and practical contexts? Employing an analytical methodology, this study endeavors to furnish a comprehensive array of conceptual components to methodically address its examination and proffer insights for pragmatic application. Employing an interpretative epistemology, the concept of cooperation is juxtaposed against a critical analysis of pertinent literature and insights gleaned from prominent contributors in the Colombian context. This endeavor aims to formulate a conceptual framework, rooted in the delineation of the "peace cooperation" category, to augment comprehension and optimize the implementation of peace cooperation strategies in regions affected by conflict. This scholarly contribution serves to delineate the contours of a novel classification within the overarching domain of development cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariangela Rueda-Fiorentino & Silvana Insignares-Cera, 2024. "International Cooperation for Peace? Development of a Conceptual Proposal," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 13, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bjz:ajisjr:2521
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2024-0010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis/article/view/13640
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis/article/view/13640/13199
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2024-0010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sartori, Giovanni, 1970. "Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 64(4), pages 1033-1053, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xinyu Zhang & Yue Liao, 2023. "A Bibliometric and Visual Analysis of Populism Research (2000–2020)," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    2. Gustav Lidén, 2013. "What about theory? The consequences on a widened perspective of social theory," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 213-225, January.
    3. Torrisi, Gianpiero, 2007. "European Social Models between Globalisation and Europeanisation," MPRA Paper 12767, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Peters, Ina, 2014. "Too Abstract to Be Feasible? Applying the Grounded Theory Method in Social Movement Research," GIGA Working Papers 247, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    5. Pursey Heugens & J. Oosterhout & Muel Kaptein, 2006. "Foundations and Applications for Contractualist Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 211-228, October.
    6. Xiaohong Yu & Zhaoyang Sun, 2022. "The company they keep: When and why Chinese judges engage in collegiality," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(4), pages 936-1002, December.
    7. Thomas Denk, 2013. "How to measure polyarchy with Freedom House: a proposal for revision," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 3457-3471, October.
    8. Matthijs Bogaards & Markus M.L. Crepaz, 2002. "Consociational Interpretations of the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 3(3), pages 357-381, September.
    9. Andersson, Kent & Bang, Martin & Marcus, Carina & Persson, Björn & Sturesson, Peter & Jensen, Eva & Hult, Gunnar, 2015. "Military utility: A proposed concept to support decision-making," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 23-32.
    10. Matthew M. C. Allen & Geoffrey Wood & Mehmet Demirbag, 2022. "Developing theoretically informed typologies in international business: Why we need them, and how to do it," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(9), pages 2133-2146, December.
    11. Liesbet Hooghe & Gary Marks, 2015. "Delegation and pooling in international organizations," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 305-328, September.
    12. Muhammad Jawad Iqbal & Hafiz Muhammad Usman Khizar, 2022. "The Epistemology of Entrepreneurial Responsible Orientation (ERO): Theory, Conceptualization, and Future Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    13. Koelewijn, Wout T. & Ehrenhard, Michel L. & Groen, Aard J. & van Harten, Wim H., 2014. "Exploring personal interests of physicians in hospitals and specialty clinics," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 93-98.
    14. Sandra Destradi, 2015. "Reluctant Powers: A Concept-Building Approach and an Application to the Case of Germany," RSCAS Working Papers 2015/46, European University Institute.
    15. Rodrigo Barrenechea & Isabel Castillo, 2019. "The many roads to Rome: family resemblance concepts in the social sciences," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 107-130, January.
    16. Graeme Auld & Stefan Renckens, 2017. "Rule-Making Feedbacks through Intermediation and Evaluation in Transnational Private Governance," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 670(1), pages 93-111, March.
    17. Mathieu Rousselin, 2012. "The EU as a Multilateral Rule Exporter - The Global Transfer of European Rules via International Organizations," KFG Working Papers p0048, Free University Berlin.
    18. Michiel van Meeteren & Ate Poorthuis & Ben Derudder & Frank Witlox, 2016. "Pacifying Babel’s Tower: A scientometric analysis of polycentricity in urban research," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(6), pages 1278-1298, May.
    19. Jessica F Green, 2017. "Policy entrepreneurship in climate governance: Toward a comparative approach," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(8), pages 1471-1482, December.
    20. Bovens, Mark, 2006. "Analysing and Assessing Public Accountability. A Conceptual Framework," European Governance Papers (EUROGOV) 1, CONNEX and EUROGOV networks.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjz:ajisjr:2521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Richtmann Publishing Ltd (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.