Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Alternative Limited Cognitive Opportunities of the Herfindal-Hirschman Index for Studying Irregularities


Author Info

  • Nina Yankova
Registered author(s):


    A single methodological approach is presented to study structural changes and irregularities, based on the Euclidean distance and the possibility to decompose the total structural change into 2 factor impacts: d3 - changing the irregularity degree and d4 - changing the irregularity direction. The cognitive opportunities of the Herfindal-Hirschman Index to study the irregularities are elucidated therein. It was proven that only the factor impact d3 is recorded by means of this index. Arguments are provided for the necessity to record the dimensions of the statistic structure in the course of assessment of the irregularity degree of evolving complex processes and phenomena, characterized by internal structure. The Euclidean distance is applied to elaborate a table for limiting 3 degrees of irregularities according to the size of the tested statistical structure.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Fee access

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute in its journal Economic Thought.

    Volume (Year): (2010)
    Issue (Month): 5 ()
    Pages: 66-80

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2010:i:5:p:66-80

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: 3, Aksakov Str., 1040, Sofia
    Phone: (+359 2) 810 40 18
    Fax: (+359 2) 988 21 08
    Web page:
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research


    Find related papers by JEL classification:


    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.



    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.


    Access and download statistics


    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econth:y:2010:i:5:p:66-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Vassil Zahariev).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.