IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bas/econst/y2020i6p155-170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Aspects of Different Sheep Production Systems in Bulgaria

Author

Listed:
  • Konstantin Stankov

Abstract

Bulgarian sheep husbandry is the most traditional occupation that helped people earning their living for thousands of years. It has laid the foundations of the crafts and industry in our country. The manuscript presents information on the measures taken by the European Parliament (EP) for the sheep husbandry development during the next decades. Detailed data on the state and development of sheep farming in Bulgaria for a period of 118 years are presented and recommendations are made in line with the theses from the EP resolution. The results of the study show that the sheep population in EC countries are declining by 2% annually. Compared to the 1980s, their number has decreased by 25 million. Sheep meat consumption in the EC has declined by 3.5 kg at 2 kg per capita. For the same period, a drastic decrease in the number of sheep and their products has occurred in Bulgaria. Compared to the 1980s, the number of sheep in the country was reduced by over 9 million. The total sheep meat production has decreased about 23 times, and that of sheep milk – 4.5 times. Consumption of sheep meat in Bulgaria decreased to 1.5 kg per capita. Sheep wool, which before the transition was a leading source of income, was removed from the group of main products and included in the by-products group.From this part, it may be concluded that Bulgaria has a substantial natural resource of pastures and cultivable land for the development of a significantly larger scale of livestock husbandry as it had been at all stages of country's development. Raising animals on pastures could be a good source of revenue for people, providing higher added value and contributing to the revival of rural areas.The next part of the paper presents information on the main economic indicators of dairy ewes and local autochthonous sheep breeds. The influence of the farming system on the ultimate economic results in the farms: extensive in the mountainous areas; semi-intensive in semi-mountainous areas and intensive for the plain regions of the country was studied. For this purpose, three of the most typical Bulgarian sheep farms with 300 ewes, 60 replacement female yearling sheep and 7-8 rams were selected. All natural and economic indicators were reported per one ewe.Sheep subject of the study was from the Bulgarian Dairy Synthetic Population, which is the most typical representative of Bulgarian dairy sheep husbandry (65.9% of the population). The second breed is the indigenous Srednorodopska sheep – a most typical representative of autochthonous sheep farming with a relative share of 26.59%. Both breeds account for 90% of the national sheep population.The results from the investigation of the three flocks reared under different geographic and technological conditions evidence a relatively poor economic effect. Sheep reared indoor all year round whose feeding was balanced, showed better economic performance.The sheep breeds and farming systems, subject of the present study provide sufficient objective information for the present state of Bulgarian sheep husbandry. The results allowed making important conclusions on the future development of the branch and proposing directions for its successful development.

Suggested Citation

  • Konstantin Stankov, 2020. "Economic Aspects of Different Sheep Production Systems in Bulgaria," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 6, pages 155-170.
  • Handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2020:i:6:p:155-170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iki.bas.bg/Journals/EconomicStudies/2020/2020-6/7_K.Stankov_f-f.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q1 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture
    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
    • Q13 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Markets and Marketing; Cooperatives; Agribusiness

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bas:econst:y:2020:i:6:p:155-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Diana Dimitrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ikbasbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.