IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bal/journl/2256-074220184556.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodological Principles Of Evaluation Of Investment Attractiveness Of The Enterprise

Author

Listed:
  • Halyna Fyliuk

    (Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Kateryna Akulenko

    (Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine)

Abstract

The purpose of the research is a complex of theoretical and applied provisions on the formation, evaluation, and improvement of the methodology of evaluation of the investment attractiveness of enterprises. Methodology. In the process of research, the following methods were used: methods of comparison, analysis and synthesis is used in determining the features of conceptual approaches to the concept of investment attractiveness of an enterprise and the formation of the author's definition of this category; method of diagnostic evaluation is used in the evaluation of existing models for analysing the investment attractiveness of enterprises; method of expert evaluation is used for the building of flexible limits of levels of investment attractiveness of the enterprise; methods of system and structural analysis is used for developing the basic elements and the general structure of the model of interpretation of the method of graphical integration; the method of graphic integration is used within the construction of graphs of investment attractiveness of enterprises A and B. The aim of the study is to justify of the approach to create a model that can justify of the feasibility of investing and determine the factors and conditions of investment attractiveness of the enterprise for different participants of the investment process. The findings of the study. The results of the research suggested an improved definition of the concept of investment attractiveness of the enterprise, which took into account the following disadvantages of existing approaches to the present essence of the concept: the investment attractiveness of the enterprise is often associated with the system of financial and economic indicators of the activity of enterprise, while not taking into account also an important social and psychological factor, since the very name of the term "investment attractiveness of the enterprise" includes the social-psychological element in the form of the concept of "attractiveness", which is widely used in economic literature; the subjective view of the potential investor on the fact that the object being considered for investing to satisfy the investor's expectations regarding the economic or social effect is significant. This aspect is key in determining of concept of investment attractiveness of the enterprise, when choosing an investor of an enterprise to invest its capital for the purpose of investing; it is necessary to achieve consistency and symbiosis between the evaluation of financial and economic, socio-psychological, industrial, innovative, environmental and other factors, which in the complex form the investment attractiveness of the enterprise; using the expression "high level of profitability on investment with minimal risks" is partially incorrect in some definitions of the investment attractiveness of the enterprise since obtaining high profits involves a certain level of risk and each investor knows about this; the importance of increasing the investment attractiveness of the enterprise has the level of involvement of innovation in the activities of the enterprise in the frames of use of investment capital; the targeting of almost all definitions only on high financial and economic indicators, which, depending on the situation, are not always correct. A complex system of indicators for evaluation of the investment attractiveness of an enterprise is proposed, consisting of six groups of indicators (market position, property complex, profitability, financial stability, risks, innovative potential), each of which includes six coefficients determining the level of investment attractiveness for this group. The features and advantages of this system of indicators are: complexity and complementary to standard methods with indicators of the level of investment risk and innovative potential of enterprises; standardization of indicators; unidirectionality of indicators; Flexibility of the recommended limits for each coefficient. The method of graphical integration of the investment attractiveness of the enterprise, which has several advantages over other methods, proposed in the scientific literature, is offered because: it is a combination that includes the advantages of an integral method, as well as a market, and partially matrix method; it allows quantifying various aspects of economic activity of the enterprise by the elementary calculation of a certain number of coefficients; it does not require significant time to spend on the evaluation; it has a mathematical justification since the final indicators for comparing the investment attractiveness of several enterprises are calculated using the numerical integration method; it has the flexibility of determining the level of investment attractiveness of an enterprise by incorporating into the methodology in accordance with the socio-psychological component of the concept of investment attractiveness and the interests of the investor; gives a visual interpretation of the results of investment attractiveness assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Halyna Fyliuk & Kateryna Akulenko, 2018. "Methodological Principles Of Evaluation Of Investment Attractiveness Of The Enterprise," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 4(5).
  • Handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2018:4:5:56
    DOI: 10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-5-387-395
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/585/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.baltijapublishing.lv/index.php/issue/article/view/585
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-5-387-395?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nadiia Davydenko & Alina Buriak & Inna Demianenko, 2018. "Investment Attractiveness Of Agricultural Sector Of Ukrainian Region In Modern Conditions Of Social And Economic Development," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 4(1).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Olena Pimenowa & Serhii Pimenov & Halyna Fyliuk & Maksym W. Sitnicki & Vasylyna Kolosha & Dmytro Kurinskyi, 2023. "Sustainable Business Model of Modern Enterprises in Conditions of Uncertainty and Turbulence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hanna Godlewska-Majkowska & Agnieszka Komor, 2021. "Energy as a Factor of Investment Attractiveness of Regions for Agricultural Enterprises," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    investments; investment attractiveness of enterprise; complex evaluation of investment attractiveness; method of graphic integration; coefficients of investment attractiveness; profitability; financial stability; investment risk;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
    • D25 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Intertemporal Firm Choice: Investment, Capacity, and Financing
    • C02 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - Mathematical Economics
    • C18 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Methodolical Issues: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bal:journl:2256-0742:2018:4:5:56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anita Jankovska (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.