IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aza/jbcep0/y2014v7i4p324-334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding where policies and decisions can go wrong: Utilising a 360 analysis model as a proactive reputation management strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Cwiak, Carol L.

Abstract

An organisation’s reputation is its most relevant asset. The perceptions of the various audiences with which an organisation interacts both directly and indirectly can enhance or destroy that reputation. Due to the critical role these audiences play in an organisation’s reputation, they should be actively considered as a part of an organisation’s reputation management strategy. This paper introduces the 360 analysis model, which considers the benefits, detriments and potential fallout in regard to different audiences when creating policy or making important organisational decisions. The model’s goal is to foster well-considered policy and decisions that proactively protect an organisation’s reputation. The model is also designed to be used as a research construct that can be utilised in the expansion of the reputation management literature in regard to heterogeneity and dynamics within and across audiences that can have an impact on an organisation’s reputation.

Suggested Citation

  • Cwiak, Carol L., 2014. "Understanding where policies and decisions can go wrong: Utilising a 360 analysis model as a proactive reputation management strategy," Journal of Business Continuity & Emergency Planning, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 7(4), pages 324-334, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:aza:jbcep0:y:2014:v:7:i:4:p:324-334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hstalks.com/article/1067/download/
    Download Restriction: Requires a paid subscription for full access.

    File URL: https://hstalks.com/article/1067/
    Download Restriction: Requires a paid subscription for full access.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    reputation management; organisational reputation; 360 analysis model; business continuity; stakeholder perceptions;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M1 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration
    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aza:jbcep0:y:2014:v:7:i:4:p:324-334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Henry Stewart Talks (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.