IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aud/audfin/v16y2018i151p382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An interdisciplinary analysis with data mining and visualization tools applied on multiple and multi-source time series - The case of the forest fund in Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel HOMOCIANU

    (Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi)

  • Dinu AIRINEI

    (Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi)

  • Ciprian Ionel TURTUREAN

    (Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi)

Abstract

Starting from the idea of poor biodiversity conservation which continues to be one of the major both national and international current problems, this paper focuses on the analysis of the evolution of the forest fund and also on the validation of a set of hypothesis regarding specific indicators related to this evolution with a special consideration for interrelations and future trends based on a custom data mining model. The time series data was provided by the Romanian Ministry of the Environment, National Bank of Romania, Romanian Court of Accounts, National Institute of Statistics, Eurostat, Global Forest Watch, Global Forest Change, Google Earth and Transparency International. This data was filtered, calibrated, exported in order to be collected and integrated into a single online spreadsheet shared for open access and then progressively refined. It served as source of online representations under the form of interactive charts and maps or other visual metaphors able to capture the space-time evolution and distribution and provide basic support for querying. Finally, it was also the starting point for further time series analysis by using data mining tools. The results confirm the hypotheses formulated also on the basis of worrying satellite data and supported by the scientific literature. They also emphasize the influence of some historical moments associated with the appearance of specific laws progressively allowing an increasing private share of forests and also with the Romania’s alignment to the European Union on the evolution of some forest fund indicators.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel HOMOCIANU & Dinu AIRINEI & Ciprian Ionel TURTUREAN, 2018. "An interdisciplinary analysis with data mining and visualization tools applied on multiple and multi-source time series - The case of the forest fund in Romania," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 16(151), pages 382-382.
  • Handle: RePEc:aud:audfin:v:16:y:2018:i:151:p:382
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revista.cafr.ro/temp/Article_9587.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ernesto Dal Bó & Pablo Hernández & Sebastián Mazzuca, 2015. "The Paradox of Civilization: Pre-Institutional Sources of Security and Prosperity," NBER Working Papers 21829, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dinu AIRINEI & Daniel HOMOCIANU, 2019. "Using the GiPlot Online Interactive Tool to Explore Business and Financial Data in the Context of the Ex Post Component of the Audit," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 17(156), pages 628-628.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mayshary, Joram & Moav, Omer & Neeman, Zvika & Pascali, Luigi, 2015. "Cereals Appropriability and Hierarchy," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 238, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    2. Ina Ganguli & Marieke Huysentruyt & Chloé Le Coq, 2021. "How Do Nascent Social Entrepreneurs Respond to Rewards? A Field Experiment on Motivations in a Grant Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(10), pages 6294-6316, October.
    3. Mayshar, Joram & Moav, Omer & Neeman, Zvika, 2017. "Geography, Transparency, and Institutions," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 111(3), pages 622-636, August.
    4. Ina Ganguli & Marieke Huysentruyt & Chloe Le Coq, 2018. "How Do Nascent Social Entrepreneurs Respond to Rewards? A Field Experiment on Motivations in a Grant Competition," UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers 2018-21, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Economics.
    5. Borcan, Oana & Olsson, Ola & Putterman, Louis, 2021. "Transition to agriculture and first state presence: A global analysis," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    6. van Besouw, Bram & Ansink, Erik & van Bavel, Bas, 2016. "The economics of violence in natural states," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 132(PA), pages 139-156.
    7. Adeyemo, Temitayo, 2021. "The 4th Industrial Revolution: What Role Does Infrastructure Play in Livelihood Choices and Outcomes of Agrarian Households?," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315136, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Ina Ganguli & Marieke Huysentruyt & Chloé Le Coq, 2021. "How Do Nascent Social Entrepreneurs Respond to Rewards? A Field Experiment on Motivations in a Grant Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(10), pages 6294-6316, October.
    9. Ivan Lopez Cruz & Gustavo Torrens, 2019. "The paradox of power revisited: internal and external conflict," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 68(2), pages 421-460, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    biodiversity conservation; forestry; interdisciplinary approach; interactive visualizations; multiple time series; data mining;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C32 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes; State Space Models
    • C88 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Other Computer Software
    • Q23 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Forestry
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics
    • Y10 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Data: Tables and Charts - - - Data: Tables and Charts
    • Y91 - Miscellaneous Categories - - Other - - - Pictures and Maps

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aud:audfin:v:16:y:2018:i:151:p:382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dumitru Valentin Florentin (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://revista.cafr.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.