IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/asr/journl/v8y2018i1p73-85.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hoeworking / teleworking. Atypical forms of employment: between usefulness and precariousness

Author

Listed:
  • Mihaela-Emilia Marica

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies,)

Abstract

The literature centered on the investigations into the implications of this activity sector, reveals that – in addition to the usual risks entailed by most atypical work arrangements, some of them even increased in the case of homeworkers and teleworkers – these workers are further exposed to the risk of social isolation, because they lack direct social contact with their peers, colleagues and organization members. The vulnerability of homeworkers is aggravated by labor legislation, as this category of workers face major difficulties in the complete, effective exercise of some rights, although the law acknowledges the equality in rights and treatment between the employees with standard work contracts, and the employees opting for flexible work opportunities. In most cases, the remuneration and social benefits granted to the latter, are lower than the payment and social benefits offered for the same type of work, to an employee working at the company’s precincts.

Suggested Citation

  • Mihaela-Emilia Marica, 2018. "Hoeworking / teleworking. Atypical forms of employment: between usefulness and precariousness," Juridical Tribune - Review of Comparative and International Law, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, vol. 8(1), pages 73-85, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:8:y:2018:i:1:p:73-85
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tribunajuridica.eu/arhiva/An8v1/6.%20Mihaela%20Marica.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jitka Volfová & Kamila Matysová & Diana Maria Vrânceanu & Claudia Elena Țuclea, 2023. "Telework Perception and Implications during COVID-19 in the Czech Republic," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2023(4), pages 59-76.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    homeworking; teleworking; atypical work arrangements; flexible work schedules.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K31 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Labor Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:asr:journl:v:8:y:2018:i:1:p:73-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.