IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/bmerar/2022p1-11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

External Audit Process Failures: Unethical Practices and Business Demise

Author

Listed:
  • John Nkeobuna Nnah Ugoani

    (Department of Management Sciences College of Management and Social Sciences, Rhema University, Aba, Nigeria)

  • Grace Iyi Ibeenwo

    (Department of Public Administration Akanu Ibiam Federal Polytechnic Unwana Afikpo, Ebonyi State, Nigeria)

Abstract

The primary aim of external auditing is for the independent auditor to comply with authoritative ethical standards in checking and verifying the authenticity of already recorded transactions and thereafter expressing an opinion as to whether the published financial statements and reports were made in all material aspects in accordance with ethical and relevant accounting and financial reporting standards and regulations. By reporting and expressing an opinion the independent auditor helps to establish public confidence and credibility over the financial statements and reports, even though such must not be interpreted as assurance regarding the future sustainability of the enterprise or with regard to the economy, efficiency, or effectiveness of management. The external audit specifically relates to the independent examination of the financial statements of an enterprise by an external auditor appointed by the shareholders. Even though the external auditor may perform the same audit procedures as in the case of the internal auditor, unlike the internal auditor, the external auditor does not report to the board and management but to the shareholders. The external audit is, therefore, important for strengthening transparency and accountability to key external stakeholders in the management of all organizations. External audit as a recognized watchdog mechanism is expected to have probing eyes on the financial statements and reports of the company as a measure of promoting corporate governance and enterprise sustainability. All forms of fraud-sheltering and accounts manipulation by external auditors in collusion with top management of individual companies are unethical and undermine the concept of audit independence; and an invitation to business demise. 230 respondents participated in this study conducted through the exploratory research design, and the result showed a strong relationship between audit process failures and business demise. A recommendation of this report is that the board and management should always ensure to implement credible external auditors’ recommendations as to measures of reducing cases of inefficiency, fraud, and business demise.

Suggested Citation

  • John Nkeobuna Nnah Ugoani & Grace Iyi Ibeenwo, 2022. "External Audit Process Failures: Unethical Practices and Business Demise," Business, Management and Economics Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, 03-2022.
    • Handle: RePEc:arp:bmerar:2022:p:1-11
    DOI: 10.32861/bmer.81.1.11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/pdf-files/bmer8(1)1-11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.arpgweb.com/journal/8/archive/03-2022/1/8
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.32861/bmer.81.1.11?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anup Agrawal & Tommy Cooper, 2017. "Corporate Governance Consequences of Accounting Scandals: Evidence from Top Management, CFO and Auditor Turnover," Quarterly Journal of Finance (QJF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 7(01), pages 1-41, March.
    2. Leonardo Rinaldi, 2019. "Accounting for Sustainability Governance: The Enabling Role of Social and Environmental Accountability Research," Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Al-Faryan, Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh, 2020. "Corporate governance in Saudi Arabia: An overview of its evolution and recent trends," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 23-36.
    4. Al-Shaer, Habiba & Zaman, Mahbub, 2016. "Board gender diversity and sustainability reporting quality," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 210-222.
    5. DeFond, Mark & Zhang, Jieying, 2014. "A review of archival auditing research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 275-326.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zvi Singer & Jing Zhang, 2022. "Do companies try to conceal financial misstatements through auditor shopping?," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1-2), pages 140-180, January.
    2. Nusirat Ojuolape Gold & Fauziah Md. Taib & Yaxin Ma, 2022. "Firm-Level Attributes, Industry-Specific Factors, Stakeholder Pressure, and Country-Level Attributes: Global Evidence of What Inspires Corporate Sustainability Practices and Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-28, October.
    3. Sebastian Kronenberger & Volker Laux, 2022. "Conservative Accounting, Audit Quality, and Litigation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 2349-2362, March.
    4. Ghafran, Chaudhry & O'Sullivan, Noel, 2017. "The impact of audit committee expertise on audit quality: Evidence from UK audit fees," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(6), pages 578-593.
    5. Fiaz Ahmad Sulehri & Saba Sharif, 2022. "The Impact of Firm Sustainability on Firm Growth: Evidence from USA," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Kausar, Asad & Shroff, Nemit & White, Hal, 2016. "Real effects of the audit choice," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 157-181.
    7. Stefano Cascino & Ane Tamayo & Felix Vetter, 2021. "Labor Market Effects of Spatial Licensing Requirements: Evidence from CPA Mobility," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 111-161, March.
    8. Liang Tan & Santhosh Ramalingegowda & Yong Yu, 2022. "Third-Party Consequences of Changes in Managerial Fiduciary Duties: The Case of Auditors’ Going Concern Opinions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 1556-1572, February.
    9. María Lourdes Arco-Castro & María Victoria Lopez-Pérez & Sara Rodriguez-Gomez & Raquel Garde-Sánchez, 2020. "Do Stakeholders Modulate Philanthropic Strategy? Corporate Philanthropy as Stakeholders’ Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    10. Singh, Abhijeet & Singh, Harjinder & Sultana, Nigar & Evans, John, 2019. "Independent and joint effects of audit partner tenure and non-audit fees on audit quality," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 186-205.
    11. Lawson, Bradley P. & Muriel, Leah & Sanders, Paula R., 2017. "A survey on firms' implementation of COSO's 2013 Internal Control–Integrated Framework," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 30-43.
    12. Pan, Yue & Shroff, Nemit & Zhang, Pengdong, 2023. "The dark side of audit market competition," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1).
    13. Mehdi Nekhili & Fahim Javed & Haithem Nagati, 2022. "Audit Partner Gender, Leadership and Ethics: The Case of Earnings Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(2), pages 233-260, May.
    14. Lee, Hua & Lee, Hsien-Li & Wang, Chen-Chin, 2017. "Engagement partner specialization and corporate disclosure transparency," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 354-369.
    15. John M. Barrios, 2022. "Occupational Licensing and Accountant Quality: Evidence from the 150‐Hour Rule," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 3-43, March.
    16. Chen, Anthony & Duong, Hong & Ngo, Anh, 2019. "Types of nonaudit service fees and earnings response coefficients in the post-sarbanes-oxley era," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 132-147.
    17. Muhammad Farhan Malik & Yuan George Shan & Jamie Yixing Tong, 2022. "Do auditors price litigious tone?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(S1), pages 1715-1760, April.
    18. Shaista Wasiuzzaman & Vasanthan Subramaniam, 2023. "Board gender diversity and environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure: Is it different for developed and developing nations?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2145-2165, September.
    19. David B. Bryan & Terry W. Mason, 2023. "Lead independent directors and accruals quality," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3-4), pages 660-679, March.
    20. Beatriz García Osma & Belén Gill de Albornoz Noguer & Elena De las Heras Cristobal, 2016. "Opinion shopping: Partner versus firm-level evidence," Working Papers. Serie EC 2016-02, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arp:bmerar:2022:p:1-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Managing Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arpgweb.com/index.php?ic=journal&journal=8&info=aims .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.