IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/and/journl/v11y2011i2p1-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environment Of Accouting Science: A Comparative Between Anglo-Saxon And Continent Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Cemal Elitas
  • Feyyaz Yildiz
  • Mustafa Uc

    (UniversitŠt Bremen Lehrstuhl Unternehmensrechnung und Controlling and Afyon Kocatepe University
    Afyon Kocatepe University
    Epoka University)

Abstract

In this study, environment of accounting science is tried to be determine and accounting is positioned in this environment. With this aim accounting systems of Anglo-Saxon and Continent Europe is compared and differences are revealed. Hence, Anglo-Saxon and Continent Europe accounting systems are analyzed with specifying environment of accounting science. Two most effective environmental factors are determined as a conclusion of intuitive analysis. Those are international relations and financial resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Cemal Elitas & Feyyaz Yildiz & Mustafa Uc, 2011. "Environment Of Accouting Science: A Comparative Between Anglo-Saxon And Continent Europe," Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, Anadolu University, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:and:journl:v:11:y:2011:i:2:p:1-18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.anadolu.edu.tr/arastirma/hakemli_dergiler/sosyal_bilimler/pdf/2011_2/2011_02_01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Accounting Science; Anglo-Saxon Accounting; Continent Europe Accounting; Accounting Environment.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M40 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - General
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M49 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:and:journl:v:11:y:2011:i:2:p:1-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Social Sciences Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iianatr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.