IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ami/journl/v15y2016i3p542-564.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Original Assessment Tool for Transparency in the Public Sector Based On the Integrated Reporting Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Alexandrina Stefanescu
  • Tudor Oprisor
  • Mara Andreea Sintejudeanu

    (Babes Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania)

Abstract

This paper aims to provide a transparency assessment tool, highlighting the importance of disclosing qualitative information to stakeholders to increase accountability in the public sector. The agency theory, stakeholders and legitimacy theory underpinning transparency in reporting as an enabler of public accountability ensure a more holistic approach in developing the disclosure framework. The main contribution of this paper relates to its methodology, comprising both quantitative and qualitative disclosures. The quantitative index was developed by overlapping the indicative metrics from the GRI guidelines and the structure of the six capitals defined by the integrated reporting framework. Furthermore, the information comprised under each capital has been analyzed by applying the qualitative characteristics of information recommended (GRI and IR), each one being deconstructed into several evaluation criteria. This study has practical implications, providing an assessment tool for enhancing public accountability throughout greater transparency in reporting by offering interesting opportunities for further empirical studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Alexandrina Stefanescu & Tudor Oprisor & Mara Andreea Sintejudeanu, 2016. "An Original Assessment Tool for Transparency in the Public Sector Based On the Integrated Reporting Approach," Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 15(3), pages 542-564, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:15:y:2016:i:3:p:542-564
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://online-cig.ase.ro/RePEc/ami/articles/15_3_5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hooks, Jill & van Staden, Chris J., 2011. "Evaluating environmental disclosures: The relationship between quality and extent measures," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 200-213.
    2. Geoff Frost & Stewart Jones & Janice Loftus & Sandra Laan, 2005. "A Survey of Sustainability Reporting Practices of Australian Reporting Entities," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 15(35), pages 89-96, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Salaheldin Hamad & Fong‐Woon Lai & Muhammad Kashif Shad & Zdeňka Konečná & Feybi Ariani Goni & Abdoulmohammad Gholamzadeh Chofreh & Jiří Jaromír Klemeš, 2022. "Corporate governance code and voluntary disclosure of integrated reporting: Evidence from an emerging economy," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1497-1510, December.
    2. Iván Andrés Ordóñez-Castaño & Edila Eudemia Herrera-Rodríguez & Angélica María Franco Ricaurte & Luis Enrique Perdomo Mejía, 2021. "Voluntary Disclosure of GRI and CSR Environmental Criteria in Colombian Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Salaheldin Hamad & Muhammad Umar Draz & Fong-Woon Lai, 2020. "The Impact of Corporate Governance and Sustainability Reporting on Integrated Reporting: A Conceptual Framework," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Aguiar, Thereza Raquel Sales & Bebbington, Jan, 2014. "Disclosure on climate change: Analysing the UK ETS effects," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 227-240.
    2. de Villiers, Charl & Alexander, Deborah, 2014. "The institutionalisation of corporate social responsibility reporting," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 198-212.
    3. Béatrice Allirol & Pascal Dumontier, 2015. "Divulgations environnementales : quel référentiel pour quelles fins ?," Post-Print hal-01188541, HAL.
    4. Contreras-Pacheco, Orlando E. & Claasen, Cyrlene, 2017. "Fuzzy reporting as a way for a company to greenwash: perspectives from the Colombian reality," MPRA Paper 85472, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Daniel Buda & Hoinaru Razvan & Mocanu Mihaela & Roman Aureliana-Geta, 2019. "IAS 41 and beyond for a sustainable EU agriculture," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 829-839, May.
    6. Haitham Nobanee & Maryam Alhajjar & Ghada Abushairah & Safaa Al Harbi, 2021. "Reputational Risk and Sustainability: A Bibliometric Analysis of Relevant Literature," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-21, July.
    7. Sahar E-Vahdati & Norhayah Zulkifli & Zarina Zakaria, 2018. "A Moderated Mediation Model for Board Diversity and Corporate Performance in ASEAN Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    8. Karen Benson & Peter M Clarkson & Tom Smith & Irene Tutticci, 2015. "A review of accounting research in the Asia Pacific region," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 40(1), pages 36-88, February.
    9. Skruibytė Izolda, 2020. "The Problems of the Assessment of Corporate Social Responsibility in the International Context," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 83(1), pages 93-112, June.
    10. Roger Simnett & Michael Nugent, 2007. "Developing an Assurance Standard for Carbon Emissions Disclosures," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 17(42), pages 37-47, July.
    11. Ramona Zharfpeykan, 2021. "Representative account or greenwashing? Voluntary sustainability reports in Australia's mining/metals and financial services industries," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 2209-2223, May.
    12. Roger Hussey, 2018. "Accounting for Leases and the Failure of Convergence," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 4(1), pages 7-24, January.
    13. Gao, Lei & Calderon, Thomas G. & Tang, Fengchun, 2020. "Public companies' cybersecurity risk disclosures," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    14. Soobaroyen, Teerooven & Ntim, Collins G., 2013. "Social and environmental accounting as symbolic and substantive means of legitimation: The case of HIV/AIDS reporting in South Africa," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 92-109.
    15. Faizah Darus & Shafawati Farhana Mohd Safihie & Haslinda Yusoff, 2019. "Propagating Transparency and Accountability Through Integrated Reporting: An Empirical Insight From a Developing Country," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(5), pages 92-109, August.
    16. Laura Broccardo & Francesca Culasso & Amandeep Dhir & Elisa Truant, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility: Does it really matter in the luxury context?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 105-118, January.
    17. Kevin Koh & Heather Li & Yen H. Tong, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance and stakeholder engagement: Evidence from the quantity and quality of CSR disclosures," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 504-517, March.
    18. Musa Ghazwani & Mark Whittington & Akrum Helfaya, 2023. "Assessing the Anti-Corruption Disclosure Practices in the UK FTSE 100 Extractive Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-33, March.
    19. Stewart Jones & Geoff Frost & Janice Loftus & Sandra Laan, 2007. "An Empirical Examination of the Market Returns and Financial Performance of Entities Engaged in Sustainability Reporting," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 17(41), pages 78-87, March.
    20. Yingjun Lu & Indra Abeysekera, 2017. "What Do Stakeholders Care About? Investigating Corporate Social and Environmental Disclosure in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 144(1), pages 169-184, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    transparency; accountability; disclosure; integrated reporting; public sector;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M40 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - General
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:15:y:2016:i:3:p:542-564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cristina Tartavulea (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.