IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aka/soceco/v42y2020i3p333-347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient experiences in a public primary health care clinic: A South African case study

Author

Listed:
  • Óscar Brito Fernandes

    (Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
    Department of Public and Occupational Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Mukhethwa Netshiombo

    (Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary)

  • László Gulácsi

    (Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary)

  • Niek S. Klazinga

    (Department of Public and Occupational Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Márta Péntek

    (Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary)

  • Petra Baji

    (Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary)

Abstract

The South African Ministry of Health has recognized experiences of care as key to strengthen patient-centred care. This case study aims to measure patient-reported experiences of care at a clinic in South Africa, and its associations with the respondents’ sociodemographic characteristics. A survey was conducted in 2019 on a convenience sample of 179 respondents. Questions on experiences of care were based on a standardised set of questions by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Logistic regression was used to examine the effects of respondents’ characteristics on their experiences. The proportion of respondents who reported that a nurse spent adequate time with them during consultation was significantly higher among literate respondents (92.3 vs. 79.5%). Those who reported past negative experiences were significantly more likely to report a positive experience in regard to perceiving adequate consulting time (odds ratio 5 3.865, with a 95% confidence interval between 1.555 and 9.607), receiving easy-to-understand explanations (4.308; 1.665–11.145), being given the opportunity to ask questions (2.156; 1.013–4.589) and shared decision–making (3.822; 1.728–8.457). The results can spur comparisons with other clinics in a similar setting and inform key stakeholders on aspects of the care experience that need greater improvement within the national framework for quality and safety assurance and patient experience measurement.

Suggested Citation

  • Óscar Brito Fernandes & Mukhethwa Netshiombo & László Gulácsi & Niek S. Klazinga & Márta Péntek & Petra Baji, 2020. "Patient experiences in a public primary health care clinic: A South African case study," Society and Economy, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 42(3), pages 333-347, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:aka:soceco:v:42:y:2020:i:3:p:333-347
    DOI: 10.1556/204.2020.00014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1556/204.2020.00014
    Download Restriction: subscription

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1556/204.2020.00014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jamieson Gilmore, Kendall & Corazza, Ilaria & Coletta, Lucrezia & Allin, Sara, 2023. "The uses of Patient Reported Experience Measures in health systems: A systematic narrative review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 1-10.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    primary health care; patient experiences; patient-centred care; South Africa; Sibasa Clinic;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C83 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Survey Methods; Sampling Methods
    • I19 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aka:soceco:v:42:y:2020:i:3:p:333-347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kriston, Orsolya (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://akademiai.hu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.