IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aip/access/v5y2024i1p68-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How administrative AI applications enhance organizational innovation and quality of work life for disabled employees: a case study of a Saudi University

Author

Listed:
  • Samer Ahmed Mohamed ALNAGGAR

    (Northern Border University, Arar, Saudi Arabia)

  • Waleed Fathi Abdulkarim ABDULKADER

    (Northern Border University, Arar, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Objectives: This study examines the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) administrative applications on the relationship between organizational innovation and quality of life for persons with disabilities. Methods/Approach: The researchers will use a descriptive-analytical approach to achieve this goal. The study population consists of employees at the Northern Border University in Saudi Arabia, and a random sample of workers who directly impact the topics covered by the study will be used. The questionnaire will be used as a tool to collect information. Results: The most important results of the study were the existence of a statistically significant correlation between the dimensions of AI and the relationship between organizational innovation and quality of life for persons with disabilities, with AI acting as a mediating variable. Conclusions: The most important recommendations were prioritizing organizational innovation for effective AI use in administration, providing training and support for organizations to integrate AI in administration, investing in AI technology for people with disabilities, developing guidelines and best practices for AI in administration, fostering collaboration between organizations, technology, and disability groups, and establish ethical policies for AI use in administration

Suggested Citation

  • Samer Ahmed Mohamed ALNAGGAR & Waleed Fathi Abdulkarim ABDULKADER, 2024. "How administrative AI applications enhance organizational innovation and quality of work life for disabled employees: a case study of a Saudi University," Access Journal, Access Press Publishing House, vol. 5(1), pages 68-84, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:aip:access:v:5:y:2024:i:1:p:68-84
    DOI: 10.46656/access.2024.5.1(5)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.access-bg.org/journalfiles/journal/issue-5-1-2024/how_administrative_ai_applications_enhance_organizational_innovation_and_quality_of_work.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.46656/access.2024.5.1(5)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anis Khedhaouria & Arshad Jamal, 2015. "Sourcing knowledge for innovation: knowledge reuse and creation in project teams," Post-Print hal-02011111, HAL.
    2. Ganter, Alois & Hecker, Achim, 2014. "Configurational paths to organizational innovation: qualitative comparative analyses of antecedents and contingencies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(6), pages 1285-1292.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marlin, Dan & Geiger, Scott W., 2015. "A reexamination of the organizational slack and innovation relationship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 2683-2690.
    2. Sheng, Margaret L. & Chien, Iting, 2016. "Rethinking organizational learning orientation on radical and incremental innovation in high-tech firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 2302-2308.
    3. Delgado García, Juan Bautista & De Quevedo Puente, Esther, 2016. "The complex link of city reputation and city performance. Results for fsQCA analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2830-2839.
    4. Chollet, Barthélemy & Géraudel, Mickaël & Khedhaouria, Anis & Mothe, Caroline, 2016. "Market knowledge as a function of CEOs' personality: A fuzzy set approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 2567-2573.
    5. Cobo-Benita, José Ramón & Rodríguez-Segura, Enrique & Ortiz-Marcos, Isabel & Ballesteros-Sánchez, Luis, 2016. "Innovation projects performance: Analyzing the impact of organizational characteristics," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 1357-1360.
    6. Daniel Ruiz-Palomo & Julio Diéguez-Soto & Antonio Duréndez & José António C. Santos, 2019. "Family Management and Firm Performance in Family SMEs: The Mediating Roles of Management Control Systems and Technological Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-22, July.
    7. Torugsa, Nuttaneeya (Ann) & O’Donohue, Wayne, 2016. "Progress in innovation and knowledge management research: From incremental to transformative innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1610-1614.
    8. Caloghirou, Yannis & Giotopoulos, Ioannis & Kontolaimou, Alexandra & Korra, Efthymia & Tsakanikas, Aggelos, 2021. "Industry-university knowledge flows and product innovation: How do knowledge stocks and crisis matter?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(3).
    9. Ewelina Zarzycka & Justyna Dobroszek & Lauri Lepistö & Sinikka Moilanen, 2019. "Coexistence of innovation and standardization: evidence from the lean environment of business process outsourcing," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 251-286, October.
    10. Jan Stejskal & Petr Hajek, 2019. "Modelling collaboration and innovation in creative industries using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 981-1006, June.
    11. Covin, Jeffrey G. & Eggers, Fabian & Kraus, Sascha & Cheng, Cheng-Feng & Chang, Man-Ling, 2016. "Marketing-related resources and radical innovativeness in family and non-family firms: A configurational approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5620-5627.
    12. Shan-Shan Liao & Ching-Yuan Lin & Ying-Ji Chuang & Xing-Zheng Xie, 2020. "The Role of Social Capital for Short-Video Platform Users’ Travel Intentions: SEM and Fsqca Findings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, May.
    13. Catia Milena Lopes & Annibal José Scavarda & Guilherme Luís Roehe Vaccaro & Christopher Rosa Pohlmann & André Luis Korzenowski, 2018. "Perspective of Business Models and Innovation for Sustainability Transition in Hospitals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    14. Pittino, Daniel & Visintin, Francesca & Lauto, Giancarlo, 2017. "A configurational analysis of the antecedents of entrepreneurial orientation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 224-237.
    15. Priit Vahter & Maaja Vadi, 2022. "The Relationship Of Technological And Organizational Innovation With Firm Performance: Opening The Black Box Of Dynamic Complementarities," University of Tartu - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper Series 138, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu (Estonia).
    16. Rammal, Hussain G. & Rose, Elizabeth L. & Ferreira, João J., 2023. "Managing cross-border knowledge transfer for innovation: An introduction to the special issue," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(2).
    17. Gonçalves, Tiago & Gaio, Cristina & Costa, Eva, 2020. "Committed vs opportunistic corporate and social responsibility reporting," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 417-427.
    18. Fotiadis, Anestis, 2018. "Modelling wedding marketing strategies: An fsQCA Analysis," MPRA Paper 88249, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Gonçalves, Tiago Cruz & Gaio, Cristina, 2023. "Corporate sustainability disclosure and media visibility: Mixed method evidence from the tourism sector," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PB).
    20. Brunetta, Federica & Marchegiani, Lucia & Peruffo, Enzo, 2020. "When birds of a feather don't flock together: Diversity and innovation outcomes in international R&D collaborations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 436-445.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    artificial intelligence; Organizational Innovation; Quality of work Life; Persons with disabilities;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • M15 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - IT Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aip:access:v:5:y:2024:i:1:p:68-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mariana Petrova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://access-bg.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.