IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aio/aucsse/v1y2014i42p259-268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alternatives Of The Historic Cost In The Evaluation Process Of Quality Costs

Author

Listed:
  • Valeriu Brabete

    (University of Craiova Faculty of Economics and Business Administration)

  • Cristian Dragan

    (University of Craiova Faculty of Economics and Business Administration)

  • Oana Staiculescu

    (University of Craiova Faculty of Economics and Business Administration)

Abstract

The presence of the competition within various fields of activity constrains the economic entities to pay increased attention to the problematics concerning the quality of the products or the services granted to consumers. In this context, the credible evaluation of the quality cost inclines to become a major concern for all economic operators. This study is based on some working hypothesis which, among others, aim the fact that, on one hand, the date which represent the base of the determinations realized in order to evaluate the quality cost are based on the principle of historic costs and, on the other hand, the specialty literature shows some failures of the information expressed under this form. Starting from these realities, the research undertaken brings into discussion the possibility of using other evaluation bases which shall be considered in order to obtain the data needed for the credible determination of the quality cost

Suggested Citation

  • Valeriu Brabete & Cristian Dragan & Oana Staiculescu, 2014. "Alternatives Of The Historic Cost In The Evaluation Process Of Quality Costs," Annals of University of Craiova - Economic Sciences Series, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 1(42), pages 259-268.
    • Handle: RePEc:aio:aucsse:v:1:y:2014:i:42:p:259-268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://feaa.ucv.ro/AUCSSE/0042v1-034.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    evaluation bases; methods based on evaluation; quality cost; advantages; disadvantages;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M40 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - General
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aio:aucsse:v:1:y:2014:i:42:p:259-268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anca Bandoi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fecraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.