IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/stagec/273117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Precision agriculture in Hungary: assessment of perceptions and accounting records of FADN arable farms

Author

Listed:
  • Takácsné György, Katalin
  • Lámfalusi, Ibolya
  • Molnár, András
  • Sulyok, Dénes
  • Gaál, Márta
  • Keményné horváth, Zsuzsanna
  • Domán, Csaba
  • Illés, Ivett
  • Kiss, Andrea
  • Péter, Krisztina
  • Kemény, Gábor

Abstract

Technological progress can provide several solutions to the most significant challenges faced by agriculture. Precision agriculture (PA) technologies have been recognised as one of the rare win-win solutions for environmental and socio-economic goals. Although they have been available for decades, their diffusion progresses at a slow rate. Therefore, in recent years, precision farming has been receiving more attention from agricultural economists. Perceptions of Hungarian FADN arable farms about precision farming were collected through a survey in order to compare with cost-benefit analyses. The survey not only revealed the details of the application of different technologies but also their impacts perceived compared to a baseline situation. For the main crops, the results confirmed that precision farming leads to increasing yields and has profitability benefits compared to conventional farming. According to the respondents, the high investment cost is the main barrier to diffusion, while subsidies and more appropriate information could foster it. Therefore, a specific subsidy package implemented both in the ‘greening’ component and in the Rural Development Programme of the European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy would be a stimulating factor for the wider spread of PA.

Suggested Citation

  • Takácsné György, Katalin & Lámfalusi, Ibolya & Molnár, András & Sulyok, Dénes & Gaál, Márta & Keményné horváth, Zsuzsanna & Domán, Csaba & Illés, Ivett & Kiss, Andrea & Péter, Krisztina & Kemény, Gábo, 2018. "Precision agriculture in Hungary: assessment of perceptions and accounting records of FADN arable farms," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 120(1), April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:stagec:273117
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.273117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/273117/files/1717_Molnar_veglegesR.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.273117?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tozer, Peter R., 2009. "Uncertainty and investment in precision agriculture - Is it worth the money?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 100(1-3), pages 80-87, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shang, Linmei & Heckelei, Thomas & Gerullis, Maria K. & Börner, Jan & Rasch, Sebastian, 2021. "Adoption and diffusion of digital farming technologies - integrating farm-level evidence and system interaction," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wynn, Katherine & Spangenberg, German & Smith, Kevin & Wilson, William, 2017. "Valuing Genetically Modified Traits in Canola Using Real Options," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 42(2), May.
    2. Curtiss, Jarmila & Jelinek, Ladislav, 2012. "Cost Efficiency and Farm Self-selection in Precision Farming: The Case of Czech Wheat Production," 131st Seminar, September 18-19, 2012, Prague, Czech Republic 135784, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Rim Lassoued & Diego M. Macall & Stuart J. Smyth & Peter W. B. Phillips & Hayley Hesseln, 2021. "Expert Insights on the Impacts of, and Potential for, Agricultural Big Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Christine Heumesser & Sabine Fuss & Jana Szolgayová & Franziska Strauss & Erwin Schmid, 2012. "Investment in Irrigation Systems under Precipitation Uncertainty," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(11), pages 3113-3137, September.
    5. Pedersen, Michael Friis & Gyldengren, Jacob Glerup & Pedersen, Søren Marcus & Diamantopoulos, Efstathios & Gislum, René & Styczen, Merete Elisabeth, 2021. "A simulation of variable rate nitrogen application in winter wheat with soil and sensor information - An economic feasibility study," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    6. Miroslav Mimra & Miroslav Kavka & František Kumhála, 2017. "Risk analysis of the business profitability in agricultural companies using combine harvesters," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(3), pages 99-105.
    7. Newsome, Lucie & Sheridan, Alison, 2018. "Taking Stock: Identifying the Growing Agricultural Service Sector in Australia," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 26.
    8. Böcker, Thomas & Möhring, Niklas & Finger, Robert, 2019. "Herbicide free agriculture? A bio-economic modelling application to Swiss wheat production," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 378-392.
    9. Heumesser, Christine & Fuss, Sabine & Szolgayova, Jana & Strauss, Franziska & Schmid, Erwin, 2011. "Investment in Irrigation Systems under Weather Uncertainty," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114536, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Schimmelpfennig, David & Ebel, Robert, 2016. "Sequential Adoption and Cost Savings from Precision Agriculture," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 41(1), pages 1-19, January.
    11. Cavallo, Eugenio & Ferrari, Ester & Bollani, Luigi & Coccia, Mario, 2014. "Attitudes and behaviour of adopters of technological innovations in agricultural tractors: A case study in Italian agricultural system," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 44-54.
    12. Lescot, Jean-Marie & Rousset, Sylvain & Souville, Genevieve, 2011. "Assessing Investment in Precision Farming for Reducing Pesticide Use in French Viticulture," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114387, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:stagec:273117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/akiiihu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.