IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijameu/329831.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers to increasing productivity on upland farms

Author

Listed:
  • Franks, Jeremy
  • Scott, Charles
  • Taylor, Elliot
  • Steele, James
  • Maughan, Catherine

Abstract

This study reports the impacts of resource constraints on upland farms in England. The majority of respondents (105, 85%) reported one constraint, 65 (52%) reported two. ‘‘Land- and tenure-related issues’’ was reported by 44 (42%); ‘‘personal and family related issues (including succession)’’ by 18 (17%); ‘‘poor cash flow and low profitability’’ by 17 (16%); and ‘‘general uncertainty regarding Brexit’’ by 16 (15%). The main impacts included reduced profitability (30 respondents), lower stocking rates (17) and investment (12), and problems managing livestock (9). Only five respondents reported that the bottleneck created by these constraints motivated the development of their business. The majority of respondents wanted direct payments to remain and there was support for grant schemes targeted at upland farming (25). However, 58 (48%) believed they could not remove their constraint without assistance, though few suggested innovative policies or instruments. The findings suggest that a farmer’s willingness and ability to adapt to changes in policy and support payments will be the most important factor in determining which upland farms continue in business after the UK has left the European Union.

Suggested Citation

  • Franks, Jeremy & Scott, Charles & Taylor, Elliot & Steele, James & Maughan, Catherine, 2020. "Barriers to increasing productivity on upland farms," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 8(4), August.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijameu:329831
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.329831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/329831/files/doi_10.5836_ijam_2020-08-125.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.329831?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijameu:329831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.