IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijameu/329827.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stock theft control mechanism and economic impact of livestock theft in the Free State Province of South Africa: Implication for agricultural management policies

Author

Listed:
  • W.A., Lombard
  • Bahta, Yonas T.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to estimate the financial impact (direct and indirect costs) of livestock theft and to identify different methods farmers used to control stock theft in the Free State Province of South Africa. The study used primary data collected from 292 commercial livestock farmers from the five municipalities of the Free State province. The direct and indirect cost of livestock theft rate was significant and mostly a higher level of management led to lower livestock theft losses. Livestock theft should be controlled successfully in order to sustain the South African livestock industry and competitiveness. The study recommends that there should be coordination and collaboration among all key role players in the industry including government institutions, the South African Police Service, agricultural businesses or organisations, farmer’s unions and stock theft units. The role players should target, eradicate or reduce stock theft and encourage controlling mechanisms in order to enhance food security, sustain livestock competitiveness and achieve sustainable development goals by reducing hunger and poverty.

Suggested Citation

  • W.A., Lombard & Bahta, Yonas T., 2019. "Stock theft control mechanism and economic impact of livestock theft in the Free State Province of South Africa: Implication for agricultural management policies," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 8(3), August.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijameu:329827
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.329827
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/329827/files/doi_10.5836_ijam_2020-08-98.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.329827?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijameu:329827. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.