IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ifaamr/264192.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

GLIMPSE 2.0: A framework to feed the world

Author

Listed:
  • Connolly, Aidan J.
  • Sodre, Luiz R.
  • Phillips-Connolly, Kate

Abstract

Five years ago a new acronym GLIMPSE was proposed in the International Food and Agribusiness Management Review to summarize the seven barriers faced by agriculture in its quest to feed the world, based on interviews of 25 agribusiness experts. Through an iterative, grounded theory methodology the original research that led to the GLIMPSE framework was validated, deepened and expanded. The new research made minor revisions to the original GLIMPSE, but confirmed it as an effective framework to explain to an interested public how agriculture can tackle the planet’s nutritional requirements if certain constraints are addressed. Specifically, international policy makers, governments, non-governmental organization, charities, industry organizations, integrated food companies and farmers often struggle to explain the complex challenges agribusiness faces, and in this respect the GLIMPSE framework allows all stakeholders to describe the main challenges agriculture faces on its journey to feed almost 10 billion people by 2050.

Suggested Citation

  • Connolly, Aidan J. & Sodre, Luiz R. & Phillips-Connolly, Kate, 2016. "GLIMPSE 2.0: A framework to feed the world," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 19(4), October.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifaamr:264192
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.264192
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/264192/files/ifamr2015.0202.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/264192/files/ifamr2015.0202.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.264192?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Connolly, Aidan J. & Phillips-Connolly, Kate, 2012. "Can Agribusiness Feed 3 Billion New People…and Save the Planet? A GLIMPSE into the Future," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(B), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Emily Waltz, 2016. "Gene-edited CRISPR mushroom escapes US regulation," Nature, Nature, vol. 532(7599), pages 293-293, April.
    3. Boehlje, Michael & Roucan-Kane, Maud & Broring, Stefanie, 2011. "Future Agribusiness Challenges: Strategic Uncertainty, Innovation and Structural Change," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 14(5), pages 1-29, December.
    4. Lakner, Zoltan & Baker, Gregory A., 2014. "Struggling with Uncertainty: The State of Global Agri-Food Sector in 2030," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 17(4), pages 1-36, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jordaan, D. & Kirsten, J., 2018. "Measuring the Fragility of Agribusiness Chains: A Case Study of the South African Lamb Chain," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277501, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Carlos J.O. Trejo-Pech & Richard N. Weldon & Michael A. Gunderson, 2016. "Earnings Management through Specific Accruals and Discretionary Expenses: Evidence from U.S. Agribusiness Firms," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 64(1), pages 89-118, March.
    3. Höhler, Julia & Kuhl, Rainer, 2014. "Corporations in an evolving competitive environment - evidence for the German agribusiness," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182689, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Meskela, Tadesse & Teshome, Yalem, 2014. "From Economic Vulnerability to Sustainable Livelihoods: The Case of Oromia Coffee Farmers Cooperative Union in Ethiopia," MPRA Paper 53901, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Scott L. Greer & Benjamin Trump, 2019. "Regulation and regime: the comparative politics of adaptive regulation in synthetic biology," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 52(4), pages 505-524, December.
    6. Chao-Chien Chen & Hsiu-Ping Yueh & Chaoyun Liang, 2016. "Strategic Management of Agribusiness: Determinants and Trends," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 12(4), pages 69-97.
    7. Höhler, Julia & Kühl, Rainer, 2016. "Do Growth Rates Depend on the Initial Firm Size? Evidence for the German Agribusiness," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 65(04), December.
    8. Trejo-Pech, Carlos O. & Gunderson, Michael A. & Baker, Timothy G. & Gray, Allan W. & Boehlje, Michael D., 2015. "Assessing Cash Holdings in Agribusiness," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(4), pages 1-20, November.
    9. Blažková, I., 2016. "Convergence of Market Concentration: Evidence from Czech Food Processing Sectors," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 8(4), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Dominic, Theresia & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2015. "The Impact of External and Internal Factors on Strategic Management Practices of Agribusiness Firms in Tanzania," GlobalFood Discussion Papers 197072, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, GlobalFood, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development.
    11. Choi, Hong Il & Sung, Young Joon & Hong, Min Eui & Han, Jonghee & Min, Byoung Koun & Sim, Sang Jun, 2022. "Reconsidering the potential of direct microalgal biomass utilization as end-products: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    12. Cucagna, Maria Emilia & Goldsmith, Peter D., 2018. "Value Adding in the Agri-Food Value Chain," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(3), February.
    13. Lopes, Miguel Vieira & Ross, R. Brent, 2013. "A Comparative Analysis of Strategic Planning Practices in Michigan Agribusiness Firms: 1992 vs. 2012," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 16(3), pages 1-30, September.
    14. Dries, Liesbeth & Pascucci, Stefano & Török, Áron & Tóth, József, 2014. "Keeping Your Secrets Public? Open Versus Closed Innovation Processes in the Hungarian Wine Sector," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 17(1), pages 1-16, February.
    15. Meskela, Tadess & Teshome, Yalem, 2014. "From Economic Vulnerability to Sustainable Livelihoods: The Case of the Oromia Coffee Farmers Cooperatives Union (OCFCU) in Ethiopia," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 17(B), pages 1-6, July.
    16. David Zilberman & Tim G. Holland & Itai Trilnick, 2018. "Agricultural GMOs—What We Know and Where Scientists Disagree," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, May.
    17. Kankam-Kwarteng, Collins & Osman, Barbara & Acheampong, Stephen, 2020. "Performance of restaurants: Recognizing competitive intensity and differentiation strategies," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 6(3), pages 25-34.
    18. Kankam-Kwarteng, Collins & Osman, Barbara & Acheampong, Stephen, 2020. "Performance of restaurants: Recognizing competitive intensity and differentiation strategies," MPRA Paper 103781, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Tamini, Lota Dabio, 2012. "Optimal quality choice under uncertainty on market development," Working Papers 148589, Structure and Performance of Agriculture and Agri-products Industry (SPAA).
    20. Carraresi, Laura & Banterle, Alessandro, 2015. "Agri-food Competitive Performance in EU Countries: A Fifteen-Year Retrospective," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(2), pages 1-26, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifaamr:264192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifamaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.