IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/erdnra/311010.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Functioning of the Family 500+ program on a selected example of rural areas

Author

Listed:
  • Sadowski, Arkadiusz
  • Samoląg, Monika

Abstract

The governmental program Family 500+ [pl Rodzina 500+] is a relatively new instrument of social policy in Poland, aimed at supporting families. It involves monthly payment of PLN 500 for each second and subsequent child in the family. If the income per person does not exceed PLN 800, the benefit is also payable for the first child. The program it has been functioning since 2016 in the presented formula (currently it is planned to extend the support to all children, regardless of the income criterion), so it is now possible to undertake research on its short-term effects. The program is aimed at families with children under the age of 18, regardless of place of residence and social status, however, it plays a specific role in rural areas, where social problems and the family model are slightly different than in urban areas. First of all, there is a disposable income disparity in the countryside, and fertility rate is higher. Therefore, research was undertaken to indicate the effects of the 500+ Program and the opinion of its beneficiaries living in rural areas. As an example, the rural commune of Duszniki, located in the Wielkopolska Region was selected. First, the authors of the paper analyzed data from the Commune Social Welfare Center, which is the program administrator at the local level. Second, they conducted a survey on a sample of 100 parents who expressed their opinions on the functioning of the program. As a result of the research, it was noticed that in the analyzed commune a significant part of the beneficiaries use support for the first child, which indicates a fairly large poverty range. On the other hand, the surveys have shown that the funds granted help to raise children, although they do not cover the necessary expenses in full. For the most part, they are devoted to the basic needs of children, such as food, clothing and education. Also, the authors noted a dangerous phenomenon of women’s professional deactivation after the ntroduction of the program. In addition, the research pointed to the existence of a specific form of “free riding” – respondents to a small extent declared the enlargement of the family after the introduction of the program, although they believed that on a national scale it will contribute to the increase in total fertility rate.

Suggested Citation

  • Sadowski, Arkadiusz & Samoląg, Monika, 2020. "Functioning of the Family 500+ program on a selected example of rural areas," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 17.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:erdnra:311010
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.311010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/311010/files/2020-RAD-17_24-42%20Arkadiusz%20Sadowski%2C%20Monika%20Samolag.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.311010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Atkinson, Anthony B., 2015. "Inequality: what can be done?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101810, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Tore Ellingsen & Elena Paltseva, 2016. "Confining the Coase Theorem: Contracting, Ownership, and Free-Riding," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 83(2), pages 547-586.
    3. Brzezinski, Michal & Najsztub, Mateusz, 2021. "The impact of "Family 500+" programme on household incomes, poverty and inequality," SocArXiv vkr6h, Center for Open Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alejandro Esteller & Amedeo Piolatto & Matthew D. Rablen, 2016. "Taxing high-income earners: tax avoidance and mobility," IFS Working Papers W16/07, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    2. Peppel-Srebrny, Jemima, 2021. "Not all government budget deficits are created equal: Evidence from advanced economies' sovereign bond markets," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    3. Peter Saunders & Yuvisthi Naidoo & Melissa Wong, 2022. "Comparing the Monetary and Living Standards Approaches to Poverty Using the Australian Experience," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 162(3), pages 1365-1385, August.
    4. Richard M. Bird, 2016. "Reforming International Taxation: Is the Process the Real Product?," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 217(2), pages 159-180, June.
    5. Scott Duke Kominers & Alexander Teytelboym & Vincent P Crawford, 2017. "An invitation to market design," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(4), pages 541-571.
    6. Franzini, Maurizio & Raitano, Michele, 2019. "Earnings inequality and workers’ skills in Italy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 215-224.
    7. Timm Bönke & Markus M. Grabka & Carsten Schröder & Edward N. Wolff & Lennard Zyska, 2019. "The Joint Distribution of Net Worth and Pension Wealth in Germany," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 65(4), pages 834-871, December.
    8. Anthony B. Atkinson & Chrysa Leventi & Brian Nolan & Holly Sutherland & Iva Tasseva, 2017. "Reducing poverty and inequality through tax-benefit reform and the minimum wage: the UK as a case-study," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 15(4), pages 303-323, December.
    9. Olga Cantó & Francesco Figari & Carlo V. Fiorio & Sarah Kuypers & Sarah Marchal & Marina Romaguera‐de‐la‐Cruz & Iva V. Tasseva & Gerlinde Verbist, 2022. "Welfare Resilience at the Onset of COVID‐19 Pandemic in a Selection of European Countries: Impact on Public Finance and Household Incomes," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 68(2), pages 293-322, June.
    10. Aleberto Alesina & Guido Tabellini & Francesco Trebbi, 2017. "Is Europe an Optimal Political Area?," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 48(1 (Spring), pages 169-234.
    11. Clément Carbonnier, 2023. "Welfare Economics and Neoliberalism: Interpreting the ideal type of perfect competition general equilibrium," Working Papers hal-04062786, HAL.
    12. Philipp Heimberger, 2020. "The dynamic effects of fiscal consolidation episodes on income inequality: evidence for 17 OECD countries over 1978–2013," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 47(1), pages 53-81, February.
    13. Jekaterina Navickė & Romas Lazutka, 2018. "Distributional Implications of the Economic Development in the Baltics: Reconciling Micro and Macro Perspectives," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 138(1), pages 187-206, July.
    14. Eduard Hartwich & Alexander Rieger & Johannes Sedlmeir & Dominik Jurek & Gilbert Fridgen, 2023. "Machine economies," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-13, December.
    15. Islam, Nizamul & Colombino, Ugo, 2018. "The case for NIT+FT in Europe. An empirical optimal taxation exercise," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 38-69.
    16. Nat O'Connor, 2018. "Economic inequality, social policy and a good society," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 33(6), pages 583-600, September.
    17. Valeria Bonis & Luca Spataro, 2018. "Optimal income taxation and migration," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 25(4), pages 867-882, August.
    18. Maarten Keune, 2021. "Inequality between capital and labour and among wage-earners: the role of collective bargaining and trade unions," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 27(1), pages 29-46, February.
    19. Nora Lustig, 2017. "Fiscal Policy, Income Redistribution and Poverty Reduction in Low and Middle Income Countries," Commitment to Equity (CEQ) Working Paper Series 54, Tulane University, Department of Economics.
    20. Schmid, Günther, 2020. "Beyond European unemployment insurance. Less moral hazard, more moral assurance?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 26(4), pages 465-480.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:erdnra:311010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/erdnnea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.