IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/eiapai/190606.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The relevance of district contexts in the UTILISATION of rural development policies: experience from Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Chiappini, Silvia
  • Toccaceli, Daniela

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiappini, Silvia & Toccaceli, Daniela, 2014. "The relevance of district contexts in the UTILISATION of rural development policies: experience from Italy," Politica Agricola Internazionale - International Agricultural Policy, Edizioni L'Informatore Agrario, vol. 2013(4), September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:eiapai:190606
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.190606
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/190606/files/3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.190606?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gary S. Becker, 1981. "A Treatise on the Family," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number beck81-1, March.
    2. Dahlman, Carl J, 1979. "The Problem of Externality," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 22(1), pages 141-162, April.
    3. Terluin, Ida J. & Venema, Gabe S., 2003. "Towards Regional Differentiation Of Rural Development Policy In The Eu," Report Series 29141, Wageningen University and Research Center, Agricultural Economics Research Institute.
    4. Giacomo Becattini & Marco Bellandi & Lisa De Propis (ed.), 2009. "A Handbook of Industrial Districts," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 12736.
    5. Olivier Crevoisier & Hugues Jeannerat, 2009. "Les dynamiques territoriales de connaissance : relations multilocales et ancrage regional," Revue d'économie industrielle, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(4), pages 77-99.
    6. Valerie Angeon & Sylvie Lardon, 2008. "Participation and governance in territorial development projects: the 'territory game' as a local project leadership system," International Journal of Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(2/3/4), pages 262-281.
    7. Andre Torre & Alain Rallet, 2005. "Proximity and Localization," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 47-59.
    8. Brasili, Cristina & Fanfani, Roberto, 2010. "The Agrifood Districts in the New Millennium," 2010 International European Forum, February 8-12, 2010, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 100456, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ewa Kiryluk-Dryjska & Barbara Więckowska & Kinga Smolińska, 2022. "Winners and Losers of the CAP’s Rural Development Policy in Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fiorenza Belussi & Silvia R. Sedita, 2012. "Industrial Districts as Open Learning Systems: Combining Emergent and Deliberate Knowledge Structures," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(2), pages 165-184, April.
    2. Nilsson, Magnus & Mattes, Jannika, 2015. "The spatiality of trust: Factors influencing the creation of trust and the role of face-to-face contacts," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 230-244.
    3. Enrique Claver-Cortés & Bartolomé Marco-Lajara & Pedro Seva-Larrosa & Lorena Ruiz-Fernández & Eduardo Sánchez-García, 2019. "Analysis of the Relationship between Support Institutions and Industrial Districts in Spain: A Regional Approach," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-17, January.
    4. Pezoa-Fuentes, Claudia & Vidal-Suñé, Antoni, 2017. "Cluster perpetuation: Maintenance of competitive advantages over time. The case of Chile's large north," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 176-188.
    5. Catherine Laurent & Françoise Maxime & Armelle Mazé & Muriel Tichit, 2003. "Multifonctionnalité de l'agriculture et modèles de l'exploitation agricole," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 273(1), pages 134-152.
    6. Steven G. Medema, 2020. "The Coase Theorem at Sixty," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 58(4), pages 1045-1128, December.
    7. David Jacobson & Francesco Garibaldo, 2011. "The Role of Company Networks in Low-tech Industries," Chapters, in: Paul L. Robertson & David Jacobson (ed.), Knowledge Transfer and Technology Diffusion, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Song, Haiyan & Xie, Karen & Park, Jinah & Chen, Wei, 2020. "Impact of accommodation sharing on tourist attractions," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    9. Guillaume Allègre & Thomas Melonio & Xavier Timbeau, 2012. "Dépenses publiques d'éducation et inégalités. Une perspective de cycle de vie," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 63(6), pages 1055-1079.
    10. Alessandro Cigno, 2007. "A Theoretical Analysis of the Effects of Legislation on Marriage, Fertility, Domestic Division of Labour, and the Education of Children," CESifo Working Paper Series 2143, CESifo.
    11. Zheng, Liang & Zhao, Zhong, 2017. "What drives spatial clusters of entrepreneurship in China? Evidence from economic census data," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 229-248.
    12. Maristella Botticini & Aloysius Siow, 2003. "Why Dowries?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(4), pages 1385-1398, September.
    13. Lamia Kandil & Hélène Perivier, 2017. "La division sexuée du travail dans les couples selon le statut marital en France - une étude à partir des enquêtes emploi du temps de 1985-1986, 1998-1999, et 2009-2010," Documents de Travail de l'OFCE 2017-03, Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques (OFCE).
    14. Robert Kaestner, 1995. "The Effects of Cocaine and Marijuana Use on Marriage and Marital Stability," NBER Working Papers 5038, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Yan Yu, 2015. "The Male Breadwinner/Female Homemaker Model and Perceived Marital Stability: A Comparison of Chinese Wives in the United States and Urban China," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 34-47, March.
    16. Kota Ogasawara & Mizuki Komura, 2022. "Consequences of war: Japan’s demographic transition and the marriage market," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 35(3), pages 1037-1069, July.
    17. Allan Puur & Leen Rahnu & Liili Abuladze & Luule Sakkeus & Sergei Zakharov, 2017. "Childbearing among first- and second-generation Russians in Estonia against the background of the sending and host countries," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 36(41), pages 1209-1254.
    18. Sunnee Billingsley, 2010. "The Post-Communist Fertility Puzzle," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 29(2), pages 193-231, April.
    19. Marcén, Miriam & Molina, José Alberto & Morales, Marina, 2018. "The effect of culture on the fertility decisions of immigrant women in the United States," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 15-28.
    20. Peggy Barlett & Linda Lobao & Katherine Meyer, 1999. "Diversity in attitudes toward farming and patterns of work among farm women: A regional comparison," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 16(4), pages 343-354, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eiapai:190606. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.informatoreagrario.it/ita/riviste/Pagri/index.asp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.