IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ecjilt/303892.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

"Aggressive Unilateralism" - The New Focus of US Trade Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Kerr, William A.

Abstract

The administration of President Donald Trump has changed the focus of the international trade policy of the United States from fostering trade liberalization through multilateral reciprocity to countering unfair and nefarious trade practices of foreign firms, state owned enterprises and governments. Concerns of countries regarding unfair and nefarious international trade practices has a long trade policy history and actions to deal with it are known in the United States Congress as aggressive unilateralism. This paper argues that in the period between the two world wars the focus of trade policy concerns shifted to trade restrictions imposed by governments. After the Great Depression and the Second World War those putting in place multilateral institutions to deal with trade problems focused exclusively on tariffs and trade barriers imposed by governments and made no provisions for governments to act against what they perceive as unfair and nefarious international trade practices of trading partners. Trade liberalization through multilateral reciprocity became the ruling paradigm of international trade policy and was accepted by most governments and all US administrations from Truman through to Obama – although aggressive unilateralism was manifest in the United States Congress. The Trump administration eschews the ruling paradigm and actively practices its own brand of aggressive unilateralism, although it does not use the term but rather wishes to make it part of the president’s brand. Multilateral trade institutions need to find the means to retain the benefits of liberalization based on multilateral reciprocity while incorporating mechanisms to allow governments to deal with unfair and nefarious international trade practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Kerr, William A., 2020. ""Aggressive Unilateralism" - The New Focus of US Trade Policy," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 21(1), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ecjilt:303892
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.303892
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/303892/files/Kerr21-1lay.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.303892?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kerr, William A., 2020. "Are the Benefits of Trade No Longer Sufficient?," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 21(2), December.
    2. Kerr. William Alexander, 2022. "he Rules of Trade in the Face of Long Running Disequilibrium," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 23(1), June.
    3. Kerr, William A., 2023. "Becalmed: The World Trade Organization at Not Yet Thirty," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 24(2), December.
    4. Ryan Cardwell & William A. Kerr, 2021. "President Biden's international trade agenda: Implications for the Canadian agrifood sector," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 69(1), pages 19-25, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Relations/Trade;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ecjilt:303892. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esteyca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.