IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/263984.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Оцінка Ефективності Діяльності Управлінського Персоналу : Зміст І Соціально-Психологічні Аспекти

Author

Listed:
  • Kopytova, Iryna
  • Zelinska, Antonina

Abstract

The purpose of paper is to determine methodological basics for development of content of evaluation of efficiency of activity of management staff and providing important social and psychological peculiarities when carrying out it. This purpose was implemented via description of content and organization aspects of evaluation. Its justified directions became a methodological basis for building criteria system for evaluation of efficiency of activity of management staff. It has a unified view and determines the basis for formation of modified index systems. A scientific novelty of the developed criteria system grounds on complex approach and highlighting a generalized criterion in a complex approach which is characterized by a specific synergetic effect. Organizational support of the evaluation is provided by a complex of principles for carrying out it, and description of social and psychological peculiarities of implementation of its functions, which ensures the efficiency of feedback in management process.

Suggested Citation

  • Kopytova, Iryna & Zelinska, Antonina, 2017. "Оцінка Ефективності Діяльності Управлінського Персоналу : Зміст І Соціально-Психологічні Аспекти," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 3(3), September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:263984
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.263984
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/263984/files/3%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%2C%20%D0%97%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%96%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%82%D1%8F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/263984/files/3%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%2C%20%D0%97%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%96%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%B0_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%82%D1%8F.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.263984?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Gibbons & Robert S. Kaplan, 2015. "Formal Measures in Informal Management: Can a Balanced Scorecard Change a Culture?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(5), pages 447-451, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Margaret A. Abernethy & Chung-Yu Hung & Laurence van Lent, 2020. "Expertise and Discretionary Bonus Decisions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 415-432, January.
    2. Ola Kvaløy & Trond E. Olsen, 2023. "Balanced Scorecards: A Relational Contract Approach," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 619-652, May.
    3. Anja Prummer, "undated". "Discrimination in Promotion," Working Papers 905, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    4. Volker Stein & Arnd Wiedemann, 2016. "Risk governance: conceptualization, tasks, and research agenda," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 86(8), pages 813-836, November.
    5. Graham, John R. & Grennan, Jillian & Harvey, Campbell R. & Rajgopal, Shivaram, 2022. "Corporate culture: Evidence from the field," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 552-593.
    6. Chih-Chao Chung & Li-Chung Chao & Chih-Hong Chen & Shi-Jer Lou, 2016. "A Balanced Scorecard of Sustainable Management in the Taiwanese Bicycle Industry: Development of Performance Indicators and Importance Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-21, May.
    7. Bei Liu & Hong Chen & Shiyan Jiang & Qingqing Sun, 2021. "Why Can’t I Work in a Green Way? Research on the Influencing Mechanism of Employees’ Labor Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-13, October.
    8. Mitra, Sovan & Lim, Sungmook & Karathanasopoulos, Andreas, 2019. "Regression based scenario generation: Applications for performance management," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    9. Margaret A. Abernethy & Jan Bouwens & Christian Hofmann & Laurence Lent, 2023. "Altruism, social norms, and incentive contract design," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 570-614, June.
    10. Claude Ménard, 2018. "Organization and governance in the agrifood sector: How can we capture their variety?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(1), pages 142-160, December.
    11. Juan‐José Ganuza & Fernando Gomez, 2022. "Designing relational sanctions in buyer–supplier relationships," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 470-491, April.
    12. Giuliano Carlo Rainatto & Orlando Roque Silva & Norberto Almeida de Andrade & Evandro de Almeida & Pedro Dornas Cipriani & Thiago Saboya & Rodrigo Teixeira Conceicao & Wellington Fernando Bastos, 2021. "A New Proposal for Innovation Indicators: A Study of the World’s Largest Patent Producing Countries," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(4), pages 201-201, July.
    13. Demartini, Maria Chiara & Otley, David, 2020. "Beyond the system vs. package dualism in Performance Management Systems design: A loose coupling approach," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:263984. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.