IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/infoec/v23y2019i3p61-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges and Solutions of Applying Large-Scale Agile at Organization-al Level

Author

Listed:
  • Florin DUMITRIU
  • Gabriela MESNITA
  • Laura Diana RADU

Abstract

Large-scale agile development receives widespread interest today in research and practice. Two different dimensions could be considered in the context of applying agile at large-scale: individual level, like project or team, and organization level. The majority of literature treats the subject of large-scale agile implementation at the individual level or not very specific. In our paper, we placed at organization level with the aim to find out the challenges and solutions that are relevant for enterprise-wide agile implementation in large organizations in order to create agility beyond individual team or project. Based on the literature review, we have found twelve challenges, grouped in three categories and three general solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Florin DUMITRIU & Gabriela MESNITA & Laura Diana RADU, 2019. "Challenges and Solutions of Applying Large-Scale Agile at Organization-al Level," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(3), pages 61-71.
  • Handle: RePEc:aes:infoec:v:23:y:2019:i:3:p:61-71
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revistaie.ase.ro/content/91/06%20-%20dumitriu,%20mesnita,%20radu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christoph Schmidt, 2016. "Agile Software Development," Progress in IS, in: Agile Software Development Teams, chapter 0, pages 7-35, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gupta, Manjul & George, Joey F. & Xia, Weidong, 2019. "Relationships between IT department culture and agile software development practices: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 13-24.
    2. Evgeny Nikulchev & Dmitry Ilin & Alexander Gusev, 2021. "Technology Stack Selection Model for Software Design of Digital Platforms," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Shivam Gupta & Vinayak A. Drave & Surajit Bag & Zongwei Luo, 2019. "Leveraging Smart Supply Chain and Information System Agility for Supply Chain Flexibility," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 547-564, June.
    4. Jie Gao & Cui Huang & Jun Su & Qijun Xie, 2019. "Examining the Factors Behind the Success and Sustainability of China’s Creative Research Group: An Extension of the Teamwork Quality Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Boris Milašinovic & Krešimir Fertalj, 2018. "Issues and Challenges of Adopting Agile Methodologies in Software Engineering Courses," International Journal of Technology and Engineering Studies, PROF.IR.DR.Mohid Jailani Mohd Nor, vol. 4(5), pages 197-202.
    6. Harry Bouwman & Jukka Heikkilä & Marikka Heikkilä & Carlo Leopold & Timber Haaker, 2018. "Achieving agility using business model stress testing," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(2), pages 149-162, May.
    7. Aref Al-Heyasi, 2018. "Individuals Performance Measurement In Agile Software Development," Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, Eurasian Publications, vol. 6(1), pages 1-6.
    8. Syed Muhammad Javed Iqbal, Muhammad Shahid Nawaz, Sulaman Hafeez Siddiqui, Muhammad Kashif Imran, 2019. "Does Project Teamwork Matter? Investigating the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Project Success," Journal of Management Sciences, Geist Science, Iqra University, Faculty of Business Administration, vol. 6(1), pages 79-95, March.
    9. Berea Cristi, 2018. "Negotiation Analysis. The Context," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 284-288, July.
    10. Muhammad Asgher Nadeem & Scott Uk-Jin Lee, 2019. "Dynamic Agile Distributed Development Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-19, October.
    11. Feldmann Anna, 2021. "The 5 P’s to success in intrapreneurial programs," Zeitschrift für das gesamte Genossenschaftswesen, De Gruyter, vol. 71(1), pages 5-37, March.
    12. C. J. Torrecilla-Salinas & O. Troyer & M. J. Escalona & M. Mejías, 2019. "A Delphi-based expert judgment method applied to the validation of a mature Agile framework for Web development projects," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 9-40, March.
    13. Marinho, Marcelo & Amorim, Luís & Camara, Rafael & Oliveira, Brigitte Renata & Sobral, Marcos & Sampaio, Suzana, 2021. "Happier and further by going together: The importance of software team behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    14. Paloma Lanza‐León & Lidia Sanchez‐Ruiz & David Cantarero‐Prieto, 2021. "Kanban system applications in healthcare services: A literature review," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(6), pages 2062-2078, November.
    15. Čelesnik Goran & Radujković Mladen & Vrečko Igor, 2018. "Resolving Companies in Crisis: Agile Crisis Project Management," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 51(4), pages 223-237, December.
    16. Shahida Mariam & Farooq Ahmad & Muhammad Nawaz Qaisar, 2019. "Managerial Coaching Induces Psychological Engagement of Employees: Moderating Effect of Knowledge Management," Global Economics Review, Humanity Only, vol. 4(1), pages 60-73, March.
    17. Appiah, Gloria & Bonsu, Samuel K. & Sarpong, David, 2021. "The unpowered customer: Co-creation as tactics of the weak," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 317-326.
    18. Kupi, Maximilian, 2020. "Late to the Party? Agile Methods in British and German Government Institutions," SocArXiv 3j4sh, Center for Open Science.
    19. Damjan Vavpotič & Marko Robnik-Šikonja & Tomaž Hovelja, 2020. "Exploring the Relations Between Net Benefits of IT Projects and CIOs’ Perception of Quality of Software Development Disciplines," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(4), pages 347-360, August.
    20. Kosztyán, Zsolt T. & Jakab, Róbert & Novák, Gergely & Hegedűs, Csaba, 2020. "Survive IT! Survival analysis of IT project planning approaches," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:infoec:v:23:y:2019:i:3:p:61-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Paul Pocatilu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.