IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/vs10y2016i18p898.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Environment, Tourist Transport and the Sustainable Development of Tourism

Author

Listed:
  • Diana Ioncica

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

  • Maria Ioncica

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

  • Eva-Cristina Petrescu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

Abstract

The article explores the complex relationships between the natural environment , tourist transport and sustainable tourism development. In order to research the impact of natural resources on tourism activity, on the one hand, and the influences of tourism on the environment, on the other hand, statistical and mathematical methods of analysis and forecast were used, namely, the analysis of the dynamics of significant indicators of the natural environment and of tourist activity, the correlation method, the Markov chains method. The analyses made lead us to the conclusion of the existence of a positive evolution of significant indicators of the natural environment, with an impact on tourist activity, such as natural parks. It has been emphasized; also, that this positive evolution has a direct influence on the attraction of visitors, specifically, foreign ones, but the intensity of this influence is average. The intensification of the actions of promotion of natural parks and, generally, of protected areas in Romania, would be a direction for attracting an increased number of visitors, with all the favourable economic consequences. On the other hand, the research has outlined the fact that, as far as the means of transportation used by tourists to visit Romania are concerned, on the first places we can see road and air transport, means of transportation which, aside from the obvious advantages for tourists, have a strong negative impact on the environment. The forecast made with the help of the Markov chains method has shown a negative trend, from the point of view of the impact on the environment, namely an increase in the share of road and air transport in the preference of foreign visitors to Romania. The current research represents a contribution to the efforts of measuring, through statistical and mathematical models, of the complex influences, in both senses, between the environment and tourist activity. Thus, an objective radiography has been made of these influences, for significant indicators of the natural environment and of tourism activity, with the aim of formulating directions of action for the increase of the positive impact and the diminishing of the negative effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Diana Ioncica & Maria Ioncica & Eva-Cristina Petrescu, 2016. "The Environment, Tourist Transport and the Sustainable Development of Tourism," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 18(S10), pages 898-898, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:s10:y:2016:i:18:p:898
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_2576.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Ioncica & Eva-Cristina Petrescu, 2016. "The European Union Solidarity Fund: An Important Tool in the Recovery After Large-Scale Natural Disasters," Romanian Statistical Review, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 64(1), pages 69-80, March.
    2. Remus Ion Hornoiu & Mihaela Ana Padurean & Ana-Maria Nica & Liviu-George Maha, 2014. "Tourism Consumpion Behavior in Natural Protected Areas," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(Special 8), pages 1178-1178, August.
    3. Rodica Minciu & Mihaela Pădurean & Delia Popescu & Remus Hornoiu, 2012. "Demand for Vacations /Travel in Protected Areas – Dimension of Tourists’ Ecological Behavior," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(31), pages 99-113, February.
    4. Peeters, Paul & Dubois, Ghislain, 2010. "Tourism travel under climate change mitigation constraints," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 447-457.
    5. Delia Popescu & Andreea Saseanu & Daniel Bulin & Grazia Calabro, 2014. "Econometric Models in Romanian Tourism under the Impact of Sustainable Development," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 16(Special 8), pages 1063-1063, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bogdan-Constantin Ibănescu & Oana Mihaela Stoleriu & Alina Munteanu & Corneliu Iațu, 2018. "The Impact of Tourism on Sustainable Development of Rural Areas: Evidence from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Petronela Tudorache & Doru Tudorache, 2019. "Sustainable Development of High Tourist Potential Rural Communities in Southern Transylvania," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 180-188, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vesselina Dimitrova & Georgi Marinov & Lino Manosperta, 2019. "Developing Low-Carbon Tourism In Puglia: Case Study Of I. Archeo.S Project," Economic Archive, D. A. Tsenov Academy of Economics, Svishtov, Bulgaria, issue 2 Year 20, pages 16-32.
    2. José Manuel Ordóñez-de-Haro & Jordi Perdiguero & Juan-Luis Jiménez, 2020. "Fuel prices at petrol stations in touristic cities," Tourism Economics, , vol. 26(1), pages 45-69, February.
    3. Dandan Liu & Dewei Yang & Anmin Huang, 2021. "LEAP-Based Greenhouse Gases Emissions Peak and Low Carbon Pathways in China’s Tourist Industry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Hall, C. Michael & Amelung, Bas & Cohen, Scott & Eijgelaar, Eke & Gössling, Stefan & Higham, James & Leemans, Rik & Peeters, Paul & Ram, Yael & Scott, Daniel & Aall, Carlo & Abegg, Bruno & Araña, Jorg, 2015. "No time for smokescreen skepticism: A rejoinder to Shani and Arad," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 341-347.
    5. Andreea F. Schiopu & Dragos C. Vasile & Claudia E. Tuclea, 2015. "Principles and Best Practices in Successful Tourism Business Incubators," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(38), pages 474-474, February.
    6. Zhang, Hong & Jin, Gui & Zhang, Zhengyu, 2021. "Coupling system of carbon emission and social economy: A review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    7. Zamparini, L. & Domènech, A. & Miravet, D. & Gutiérrez, A., 2022. "Green mobility at home, green mobility at tourism destinations: A cross-country study of transport modal choices of educated young adults," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    8. Rafael Robina Ramírez & Manuel Pulido Fernández, 2018. "Religious Travellers’ Improved Attitude towards Nature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-23, August.
    9. Kampanad Bhaktikul & Sayam Aroonsrimorakot & Meena Laiphrakpam & Warit Paisantanakij, 2021. "Toward a low-carbon tourism for sustainable development: a study based on a royal project for highland community development in Chiang Rai, Thailand," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(7), pages 10743-10762, July.
    10. Faiza Manzoor & Longbao Wei & Muhammad Asif & Muhammad Zia ul Haq & Hafiz ur Rehman, 2019. "The Contribution of Sustainable Tourism to Economic Growth and Employment in Pakistan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-14, October.
    11. Liming Yao & Jiuping Xu & Yifan Li, 2014. "Evaluation of the Efficiency of Low Carbon Industrialization in Cultural and Natural Heritage: Taking Leshan as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-18, June.
    12. Weaver, David B. & Lawton, Laura J., 2017. "A new visitation paradigm for protected areas," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 140-146.
    13. Anna Scuttari & Lucia Maria Della & Umberto Martini, 2014. "La mobilit? sostenibile tra destination management e mobility management. Un?analisi esplorativa in alto adige," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(1), pages 125-151.
    14. Kevin Blattler & Hannes Wallimann & Widar von Arx, 2024. "Free public transport to the destination: A causal analysis of tourists' travel mode choice," Papers 2401.14945, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    15. Taher Safarrad & Mostafa Ghadami & Andreas Dittmann & Mousa Pazhuhan (Panahandeh Khah), 2021. "Tourism Effect on the Spatiotemporal Pattern of Land Surface Temperature (LST): Babolsar and Fereydonkenar Cities (Cases Study in Iran)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-25, September.
    16. Cheng, Qian & Su, Baoren & Tan, Jin, 2013. "Developing an evaluation index system for low-carbon tourist attractions in China – A case study examining the Xixi wetland," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 314-320.
    17. Suah Kim & Namjo Kim, 2020. "A Social Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Vehicle Restriction Policy for Reducing Overtourism in Udo, Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, January.
    18. Gössling, Stefan, 2013. "National emissions from tourism: An overlooked policy challenge?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 433-442.
    19. Paul Peeters & Martin Landré, 2011. "The Emerging Global Tourism Geography—An Environmental Sustainability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-30, December.
    20. José Ruiz-Meza & Julio Brito & Jairo R. Montoya-Torres, 2021. "Multi-Objective Fuzzy Tourist Trip Design Problem with Heterogeneous Preferences and Sustainable Itineraries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    the environment; tourist transport; sustainable tourism development; environmental pollution; climate change.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods
    • L83 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Sports; Gambling; Restaurants; Recreation; Tourism
    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:s10:y:2016:i:18:p:898. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.