IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v26y2024i65p181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Artificial Intelligence and the Modelling of Teachers’ Competencies

Author

Listed:
  • Ramona Simut

    (University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania)

  • Ciprian Simut

    (University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania)

  • Daniel Badulescu

    (University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania)

  • Alina Badulescu

    (University of Oradea, Oradea, Romania)

Abstract

This research explores educators' perceptions of their role in shaping competencies and also presents the key challenges and measures perceived by educators in the AI system development landscape. The study employs a partial least square – structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) as the primary analytical tool. A set of hypotheses was derived from the literature, formulated and tested to substantiate the relationship between educators' attitudes and competencies. The findings highlight a significant positive relationship between teachers' attitudes toward AI and competence development, with the most pronounced impact on educational management competencies. Thus, teachers' positive attitudes toward AI statistically significant influence cognitive, fundamental and educational management competencies, underscoring the critical role of instilling positive attitude towards AI among educators to foster the development of multifaceted competencies. Furthermore, the research highlights key challenges to integrating AI into education, including the imperative for professional development for educators and ensuring equitable access to educational resources and technology. From a practical point of view, the study advocates for initiatives aimed at bridging the digital divide and integrating AI education into curricula as indispensable policy measures. The originality of our research lies in the unitary approach of the relationship between positive attitudes of teachers toward artificial intelligence and a series of competencies, such as cognitive, fundamental and educational management. Although the study provides valuable information, it has certain limitations. The findings are based on educators' perceptions and attitudes, which may vary among individuals, the study scope is limited to a specific region, and the generalisability of findings to other settings may require further investigation. This research contributes to the existing literature by exploring the relationship between teachers' attitudes toward AI and the development of their skills, with the help of an exploratory model using structural equations, a model that has the teachers in the foreground.

Suggested Citation

  • Ramona Simut & Ciprian Simut & Daniel Badulescu & Alina Badulescu, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence and the Modelling of Teachers’ Competencies," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 26(65), pages 181-181, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:26:y:2024:i:65:p:181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_3286.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mikhail V. Vinichenko & Alexander V. Melnichuk & Peter Karácsony, 2020. "Technologies of improving the university efficiency by using artificial intelligence: motivational aspect," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(4), pages 2696-2714, June.
    2. Mihai Felea & Cristinel Vasiliu, 2005. "Aspects of the Commercial Education in the European Higher Education," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 7(17), pages 117-120, April.
    3. Thomas K.F. Chiu & Ching-sing Chai, 2020. "Sustainable Curriculum Planning for Artificial Intelligence Education: A Self-Determination Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Rose Luckin, 2017. "Towards artificial intelligence-based assessment systems," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 1(3), pages 1-3, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gábor Szabó-Szentgróti & Bence Végvári & József Varga, 2021. "Impact of Industry 4.0 and Digitization on Labor Market for 2030-Verification of Keynes’ Prediction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Pacala Abayog Frank Angelo, 2023. "Curriculum theory and practice: A comparative literature review," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - SOCIAL SCIENCES, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 13(2), pages 3-13.
    3. Xiao-Fan Lin & Lu Chen & Kan Kan Chan & Shiqing Peng & Xifan Chen & Siqi Xie & Jiachun Liu & Qintai Hu, 2022. "Teachers’ Perceptions of Teaching Sustainable Artificial Intelligence: A Design Frame Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Igor Denisov & Yelena Petrenko & Irina Koretskaya & Stanislav Benčič, 2021. "The Gameover in Universities Education Management during the Pandemic COVID-19: Challenges to Sustainable Development in a Digitalized Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1, July.
    5. Yun Dai & Ching-Sing Chai & Pei-Yi Lin & Morris Siu-Yung Jong & Yanmei Guo & Jianjun Qin, 2020. "Promoting Students’ Well-Being by Developing Their Readiness for the Artificial Intelligence Age," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Mihaela-Elena Ulmeanu & Cristian-Vasile Doicin & Paulina Spânu, 2021. "Comparative Evaluation of Sustainable Framework in STEM Intensive Programs for Secondary and Tertiary Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-33, January.
    7. Aithal, Sreeramana & Aithal, Shubhrajyotsna, 2020. "Promoting Faculty and Student-Centered Research and Innovation based Excellence Model to Reimage Universities," MPRA Paper 101751, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Nabil Hasan Al-Kumaim & Abdulsalam K. Alhazmi & Fathey Mohammed & Nadhmi A. Gazem & Muhammad Salman Shabbir & Yousef Fazea, 2021. "Exploring the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on University Students’ Learning Life: An Integrated Conceptual Motivational Model for Sustainable and Healthy Online Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Yazdani, Morteza & Pamucar, Dragan & Erdmann, Anett & Toro-Dupouy, Luis, 2023. "Resilient sustainable investment in digital education technology: A stakeholder-centric decision support model under uncertainty," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    10. Carla Henriques & Ana Matos & Madalena Malva & Elena Bartkiene & Ilija Djekic & Monica Tarcea & Marijana Matek Sarić & Maša Černelič-Bizjak & Veronika Dolar & Ayman El-Kenawy & Vanessa Ferreira & Dace, 2022. "Marketing motivations influencing food choice in 16 countries: segmentation and cluster analysis," Post-Print hal-03121000, HAL.
    11. Aithal, Sreeramana & Aithal, Shubhrajyotsna, 2020. "Conceptual Analysis on Higher Education Strategies for various Tech-Generations," MPRA Paper 104025, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Binbin Cai & Yin Chen & Arslan Ayub, 2023. "“Quiet the Mind, and the Soul Will Speak”! Exploring the Boundary Effects of Green Mindfulness and Spiritual Intelligence on University Students’ Green Entrepreneurial Intention–Behavior Link," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-21, February.
    13. Min Tao & Xiong Wang, 2023. "An Integrated MCDM Model for Sustainable Course Planning: An Empirical Case Study in Accounting Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-25, March.
    14. Po-Kang Shih & Chun-Hung Lin & Leon Yufeng Wu & Chih-Chang Yu, 2021. "Learning Ethics in AI—Teaching Non-Engineering Undergraduates through Situated Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Artificial intelligence (AI); educator; competencies; attitude.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A21 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Pre-college
    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:26:y:2024:i:65:p:181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.