IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adi/ijbess/v4y2022i2p20-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring the implementation of the design thinking concept in the creative industry:Study on the Culinary Subsector in Bandung City

Author

Listed:
  • Jurry Hatammimi

    (School of Economics and Business, Telkom University)

Abstract

Bandung is one of the cities with a high culinary appeal. However, there are several problems found such as a decrease in sales due to the Covid-19, not conducting the market surveys, and tight competition in the culinary industry. One of the concepts that can solve these problems is a human-centered approach called Design Thinking. Hence, it is needed to measure whether the concept is already implemented or not. The result of this measurement can define the further plan to solve the problems stated. Design thinking is the rationale in the process of transforming a creative mindset into an innovation. This study measures the implementation of the Design Thinking concept in the culinary subsector in Bandung which includes five stages, namely: empathize, define, ideation, prototype, and test. The data collection is conducted by distributing questionnaires to 92 dine-in and 92 takeaway culinary businesses. The data gathered is then processed by using the descriptive statistical analysis technique and a two-tailed t-test. The result of the study indicates that the culinary business actors in Bandung city have implemented the Design Thinking concept well, although the empathize and define stages are still included in the bad category. There is also a difference in implementing the Design Thinking concept between dine-in and takeaway culinary businesses. Further study is expected to measure the impact of the Design Thinking concept’s implementation on the culinary businesses’ sales performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Jurry Hatammimi, 2022. "Measuring the implementation of the design thinking concept in the creative industry:Study on the Culinary Subsector in Bandung City," International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 4(2), pages 20-27, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:adi:ijbess:v:4:y:2022:i:2:p:20-27
    DOI: 10.36096/ijbes.v4i2.326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bussecon.com/ojs/index.php/ijbes/article/view/326/162
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.36096/ijbes.v4i2.326
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.36096/ijbes.v4i2.326?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jui-Che Tu & Li-Xia Liu & Kuan-Yi Wu, 2018. "Study on the Learning Effectiveness of Stanford Design Thinking in Integrated Design Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-21, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jih-Sheng Lo & Chi-Hung Lo & Shyh-Chour Huang & Wei-Chen Wang, 2019. "Application of User Experience and Design Thinking to the Construction of a Class Assistance System for Hearing- and Speech-Impaired People," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-27, December.
    2. Yi-Chen Lai & Li-Hsun Peng, 2019. "Effective Teaching and Activities of Excellent Teachers for the Sustainable Development of Higher Design Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-27, December.
    3. Triyuth Promsiri & Krisakorn Sukavejworakit & Vasu Keerativutisest & Thanaphol Virasa & Krischanan Kampanthong, 2022. "Sustaining Thai Government Agency Innovation through Design Thinking Learning Effectiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-13, June.
    4. He-Hai Liu & Yu-Sheng Su, 2018. "Effects of Using Task-Driven Classroom Teaching on Students’ Learning Attitudes and Learning Effectiveness in an Information Technology Course," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, October.
    5. Afred Suci & Sri Maryanti & Hardi Hardi & Nining Sudiar, 2022. "Embedding Design Thinking Paradigm in a University’s Business Assistance to Small Business," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 177-201, April.
    6. Jui-Che Tu & Xu Zhang & Xiu-Yue Zhang, 2021. "Basic Courses of Design Major Based on the ADDIE Model: Shed Light on Response to Social Trends and Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, April.
    7. Gökhan Ilgaz & Menekşe Eskici, 2018. "Examination of Teacher Candidates’ Lifelong Learning Competence and Basic Motivation Resources as Parts of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Georgi V. Georgiev & Vijayakumar Nanjappan, 2023. "Sustainability Considerations in Digital Fabrication Design Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, January.
    9. Tz-Heng Hsu & Gwo-Jiun Horng & Aaron Raymond See, 2021. "Change in Learning Motivation Observed through the Introduction of Design Thinking in a Mobile Application Programming Course," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-13, July.
    10. José Rodrigues & Carla Chicau Borrego & Paula Ruivo & Pedro Sobreiro & David Catela & José Amendoeira & Rui Matos, 2020. "Conceptual Framework for the Research on Quality of Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    11. Hartmut Derler & Simon Berner & Daniela Grach & Alfred Posch & Ulrike Seebacher, 2019. "Project-Based Learning in a Transinstitutional Research Setting: Case Study on the Development of Sustainable Food Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Teen-Hang Meen & Charles Tijus & Jui-Che Tu, 2019. "Selected Papers from the Eurasian Conference on Educational Innovation 2019," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-12, December.
    13. He-Hai Liu & Qi Wang & Yu-Sheng Su & Liang Zhou, 2019. "Effects of Project-Based Learning on Teachers’ Information Teaching Sustainability and Ability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-16, October.
    14. Sohail Ahmed Soomro & Hernan Casakin & Georgi V. Georgiev, 2021. "Sustainable Design and Prototyping Using Digital Fabrication Tools for Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adi:ijbess:v:4:y:2022:i:2:p:20-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibihutr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.