IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aaw/gprjrn/v1y2016i1p53-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Partisanship and Voting Behavior: A Case Study of General Election 2008 in District Charsadda

Author

Listed:
  • Hassan Shah

    (PhD Political Science,Department of Political Science,University of Buner, KP, Pakistan.)

  • Jan Alam

    (Research Scholar, Department of Political Science,Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, KP, Pakistan.)

  • Sumbal Jameel

    (Research Scholar,Department of Political Science,Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, KP, Pakistan.)

Abstract

The role of Political parties and politicians are indispensable for making democracy. The finding the paper is the role of political parties and the personality of the contesting candidate in shaping voting behavior in District Charsadda in the 2008 election. The focused area of the study is district Charsadda of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. The data collected through a multistage sampling method in which ten union councils out of 49 were selected which 20% of the total union councils.

Suggested Citation

  • Hassan Shah & Jan Alam & Sumbal Jameel, 2016. "Partisanship and Voting Behavior: A Case Study of General Election 2008 in District Charsadda," Global Political Review, Humanity Only, vol. 1(1), pages 53-64, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:aaw:gprjrn:v:1:y:2016:i:1:p:53-64
    DOI: 10.31703/gpr.2016(I-I).06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://gprjournal.com/jadmin/Auther/31rvIolA2LALJouq9hkR/T5Z4I9GB2Q.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.gprjournal.com/issue/Partisanship-and-Voting-Behavior-A-Case-Study-of-General-Election-2008-in-District-Charsadda
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31703/gpr.2016(I-I).06?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berger, Jonah & Meredith, Marc & Wheeler, S. Christian, 2006. "Can Where People Vote Influence How They Vote? The Influence of Polling Location Type on Voting Behavior," Research Papers 1926, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    2. LeDuc, Lawrence & Clarke, Harold D. & Jenson, Jane & Pammett, Jon H., 1984. "Partisan Instability in Canada: Evidence from a New Panel Study," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 78(2), pages 470-484, June.
    3. Franklin, Charles H. & Jackson, John E., 1983. "The Dynamics of Party Identification," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 77(4), pages 957-973, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hassan Shah & Jan Alam & Sumbal Jameel, 2016. "Partisanship and Voting Behavior: A Case Study of General Election 2008 in District Charsadda," Global Economics Review, Humanity Only, vol. 1(1), pages 53-64, December.
    2. Logan Dancey & Paul Goren, 2010. "Party Identification, Issue Attitudes, and the Dynamics of Political Debate," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(3), pages 686-699, July.
    3. Andy Anim & John Obeng Addai & Ernest Osei Akuoko & Rebecca Hammond & Casey Esaa Sey, 2022. "Candidate Policy Ideas and Other Factors that Affect Election Results: A Case Study of Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 13(1), pages 44-58.
    4. John Jackson, 2014. "Location, location, location: the Davis-Hinich model of electoral competition," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 197-218, April.
    5. Chang Wen-Chun, 2008. "Toward Independence or Unification?," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 13(2), pages 1-32, January.
    6. Ron Shachar, 2003. "Party loyalty as habit formation," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(3), pages 251-269.
    7. Daniel J. Benjamin & James J. Choi & A. Joshua Strickland, 2010. "Social Identity and Preferences," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(4), pages 1913-1928, September.
    8. James Endersby, 1994. "Nonpolicy issues and the spatial theory of voting," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 251-265, August.
    9. Robert Erikson & Mikhail Filippov, 2001. "Electoral Balancing in Federal and Sub-national Elections: The Case of Canada," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 313-331, December.
    10. Arbatli, Cemal Eren & Gomtsyan, David, 2019. "Voting retrospectively: Critical junctures and party identification," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 356-390.
    11. Laura Mayoral & Juan J. Dolado & Jesús Gonzalo, 2003. "Long-range dependence in Spanish political opinion poll series," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(2), pages 137-155.
    12. Remo Nitschke, 2019. "Zwischen Baum und Borke – Die Parteipräferenzen von ehemaligen Ostdeutschen, die mittlerweile in Westdeutschland leben," ifo Dresden berichtet, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 26(05), pages 09-15, October.
    13. Alan S. Zuckerman & Malcolm Brynin, 2001. "A Decision Heuristic for Party Identification: New British and German Data and a New Understanding for a Classic Concept," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 268, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    14. Andrew B. Whitford, 2007. "Competing Explanations for Bureaucratic Preferences," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 19(3), pages 219-247, July.
    15. Alan S. Gerber & Gregory A. Huber & Ebonya Washington, 2009. "Party Affiliation, Partisanship, and Political Beliefs: A Field Experiment," NBER Working Papers 15365, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Voting Behaviour; Political Party; District Charsadda;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aaw:gprjrn:v:1:y:2016:i:1:p:53-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: M Imran Khan (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.humanityonly.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.