IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/vid/yearbk/v5y2007i1p357-379.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Childbearing preferences and family issues in Europe: evidence from the Eurobarometer 2006 survey

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Kuhnt, Anne-Kristin & Buhr, Petra, 2016. "Biographical risks and their impact on uncertainty in fertility expectations: A gender-specific study based on the German Family Panel," Duisburger Beiträge zur soziologischen Forschung 2016-03, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute of Sociology.
  2. Maria Rita Testa & Laura Cavalli & Alessandro Rosina, 2014. "The Effect of Couple Disagreement about Child-Timing Intentions: A Parity-Specific Approach," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 40(1), pages 31-53, March.
  3. Allan Puur & Livia Sz. Oláh & Mariam Irene Tazi-Preve & Jürgen Dorbritz, 2008. "Men's childbearing desires and views of the male role in Europe at the dawn of the 21st century," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 19(56), pages 1883-1912.
  4. Anne Salles & Clémentine Rossier & Sara Brachet, 2010. "Understanding the long term effects of family policies on fertility: The diffusion of different family models in France and Germany," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 22(34), pages 1057-1096.
  5. Petra Buhr & Katharina Lutz & Timo Peter, 2018. "The influence of the number of siblings on expected family size in a cohort of young adults in Germany," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 39(10), pages 315-336.
  6. Ian Dey & Fran Wasoff, 2010. "Another Child? Fertility Ideals, Resources and Opportunities," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 29(6), pages 921-940, December.
  7. Kreyenfeld, Michaela & Zinn, Sabine, 2021. "Coronavirus and care: How the coronavirus crisis affected fathers' involvement in Germany," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 44(4), pages 99-124.
  8. Jessica Cremonese & Marianna Marcon & Laura Oppi & Giulia Paletti & Vincenzo Romolo & Pamela Tozzo & Luciana Caenazzo, 2022. "An Update on Planned Oocyte Cryopreservation (POC) in Italy: Medical, Epidemiological and Legal Consideration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-17, February.
  9. Francesca Modena & Concetta Rondinelli & Fabio Sabatini, 2014. "Economic Insecurity and Fertility Intentions: The Case of Italy," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 60(S1), pages 233-255, May.
  10. Tatsuki Inoue amd Erika Igarashi, 2023. "The far-reaching effects of bombing on fertility in mid-20th century Japan," Papers 2306.05770, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
  11. Albert Esteve & Diederik Boertien & Ryohei Mogi & Mariona Lozano, 2020. "Moving out the parental home and partnership formation as social determinants of low fertility," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 18(1), pages 33-37.
  12. Jonas Wood & Karel Neels & Jorik Vergauwen, 2016. "Economic and Institutional Context and Second Births in Seven European Countries," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 35(3), pages 305-325, June.
  13. Michaela Kreyenfeld & Sabine Zinn & Theresa Entringer & Jan Goebel & Markus M. Grabka & Daniel Graeber & Martin Kroh & Hannes Kröger & Simon Kühne & Stefan Liebig & Carsten Schröder & Jürgen Schupp & , 2020. "Coronavirus & Care: How the Coronavirus Crisis Affected Fathers’ Involvement in Germany," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1096, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
  14. Øystein Kravdal, 2010. "Demographers’ interest in fertility trends and determinants in developed countries: Is it warranted?," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 22(22), pages 663-690.
  15. Ester Lazzari & Edith Gray & Georgina Chambers, 2021. "The contribution of assisted reproductive technology to fertility rates and parity transition: An analysis of Australian data," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 45(35), pages 1081-1096.
  16. Olga Gómez-Ortiz & Carmen Sánchez-Sánchez, 2022. "Is the Predisposition to Have More Children Beneficial among Parents with Only One Child? Evidence from Spanish Parents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-14, June.
  17. David De Wachter & Karel Neels, 2011. "Educational differentials in fertility intentions and outcomes: family formation in Flanders in the early 1990s," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 9(1), pages 227-258.
  18. Sarah Gibney & Liam Delaney & Mary Codd & Tony Fahey, 2017. "Lifetime Childlessness, Depressive Mood and Quality of Life Among Older Europeans," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 130(1), pages 305-323, January.
  19. Tomáš Sobotka & Éva Beaujouan, 2014. "Two Is Best? The Persistence of a Two-Child Family Ideal in Europe," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 40(3), pages 391-419, September.
  20. Tomas Frejka & Tomáš Sobotka, 2008. "Overview Chapter 1: Fertility in Europe," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 19(3), pages 15-46.
  21. Michaela Kreyenfeld & Sabine Zinn, 2021. "Coronavirus and care: How the coronavirus crisis affected fathers' involvement in Germany," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 44(4), pages 99-124.
  22. Michaela Kreyenfeld & Esther Geisler & Teresa Castro Martín & Tina Hannemann & Valerie Heintz-Martin & Marika Jalovaara & Hill Kulu & Silvia Meggiolaro & Dimitri Mortelmans & Inge Pasteels & Marta Sei, 2017. "Social policies, separation, and second birth spacing in Western Europe," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 37(37), pages 1245-1274.
  23. Roberta Rutigliano & Gøsta Esping-Andersen, 2018. "Partnership Choice and Childbearing in Norway and Spain," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 34(3), pages 367-386, August.
  24. Zhiyun Li & Hualei Yang & Xianchen Zhu & Lin Xie, 2021. "A Multilevel Study of the Impact of Egalitarian Attitudes Toward Gender Roles on Fertility Desires in China," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 40(4), pages 747-769, August.
  25. Alin Ceobanu & Tanya Koropeckyj-Cox, 2013. "Should International Migration Be Encouraged to Offset Population Aging? A Cross-Country Analysis of Public Attitudes in Europe," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 32(2), pages 261-284, April.
  26. Tomáš Sobotka, 2009. "Sub-Replacement Fertility Intentions in Austria [Intentions de fécondité inférieures au seuil de remplacement en Autriche]," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 25(4), pages 387-412, November.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.