IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/spr/demogr/v4y1967i2p907-924.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

On Measuring the Marriage Squeeze

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Che-Fu Lee, 1972. "Asymptotic implications of fluctuating nuptiality and fertility considering both sexes together," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 9(4), pages 549-567, November.
  2. Gevrek, Deniz & Gevrek, Z. Eylem, 2020. "Education, Spatial Disparities in Schooling and Black-White Interracial Marriage," IZA Discussion Papers 13594, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
  3. Walt Saveland & Paul Glick, 1969. "First-marriage decrement tables by color and sex for the United States in 1958–60," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 6(3), pages 243-260, August.
  4. Nicholas Wright, 1968. "Recent fertility change in Ceylon and prospects for the national family planning program," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 5(2), pages 745-756, June.
  5. Robert Schoen, 1983. "Measuring the tightness of a marriage squeeze," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 20(1), pages 61-78, February.
  6. Quanbao Jiang & Xiaomin Li & Shuzhuo Li & Marcus W. Feldman, 2016. "China’s Marriage Squeeze: A Decomposition into Age and Sex Structure," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 127(2), pages 793-807, June.
  7. Ted Bergstrom & David Lam, "undated". "The Effect of Cohort Sizes on Marriage Markets in Twentieth Century Sweden," Papers _029, University of Michigan, Department of Economics.
  8. Charles Hirschman & Judah Matras, 1971. "A new look at the marriage market and nuptiality rates, 1915–1958," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 8(4), pages 549-569, November.
  9. Yolien De Hauw & André Grow & Jan Van Bavel, 2017. "The Reversed Gender Gap in Education and Assortative Mating in Europe," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 33(4), pages 445-474, October.
  10. Aycan, Çelikaksoy & Lena, Nekby & Saman, Rashid, 2009. "Assortative Mating by Ethnic Background and Education in Sweden: The Role of Parental Composition on Partner Choice," SULCIS Working Papers 2009:7, Stockholm University, Linnaeus Center for Integration Studies - SULCIS.
  11. Olga Shemyakina, 2009. "The Marriage Market and Tajik Armed Conflict," HiCN Working Papers 66, Households in Conflict Network.
  12. Anderson, K.S., 2000. "Why the Marriage Squeeze Cannot Cause Dowry Inflation," Other publications TiSEM 508dfa3d-a1b0-4bd3-a0d7-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
  13. Olga Shemyakina, 2013. "Patterns in Female Age at First Marriage and Tajik Armed Conflict [Les évolutions de l’âge des femmes au premier mariage et le conflit armé Tadjike]," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 29(3), pages 303-343, August.
  14. Martin Kolk, 2015. "Age Differences in Unions: Continuity and Divergence Among Swedish Couples Between 1932 and 2007," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 31(4), pages 365-382, October.
  15. Jan Eckhard & Johannes Stauder, 2018. "Migration and the Partner Market: How Gender-Selective Relocations Affect Regional Mating Chances in Germany," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 34(1), pages 59-86, February.
  16. Anderson, Siwan, 2007. "Why the marriage squeeze cannot cause dowry inflation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 137(1), pages 140-152, November.
  17. Ina Jaschinski, 2009. "Der Übergang in eine nacheheliche Partnerschaft: eine vergleichende Analyse zwischen Männern und Frauen auf Basis des deutschen Generations and Gender Surveys," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2009-038, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
  18. Inbar Weiss & Guy Stecklov, 2020. "Assimilation and ethnic marriage-squeeze in early 20th century America: A gender perspective," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 42(4), pages 99-132.
  19. Neelakantan, Urvi & Tertilt, Michèle, 2008. "A note on marriage market clearing," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 103-105, November.
  20. Wanchuan Lin & Kathryn McEvilly & Juan Pantano, 2016. "Obesity and sex ratios in the U.S," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 269-292, June.
  21. Giulia Corti & Stefani Scherer, 2021. "Mating Market and Dynamics of Union Formation," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 37(4), pages 851-876, November.
  22. H. Muhsam, 1974. "The marriage squeeze," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 11(2), pages 291-299, May.
  23. Anderson, K.S., 2000. "Why the Marriage Squeeze Cannot Cause Dowry Inflation," Discussion Paper 2000-86, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  24. V. Bhaskar, 2011. "Sex Selection and Gender Balance," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 3(1), pages 214-244, February.
  25. Paul Glick & Arthur Norton, 1973. "Perspectives on the recent upturn in divorce and remarriage," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 10(3), pages 301-314, August.
  26. Albert Esteve & Coro Chasco & Antonio López-Gay, 2022. "Modeling Local Variations in Intermarriage," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, March.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.