IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/swpcom/342011.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

NATO's Deterrence and Defense Posture Review

Author

Listed:
  • Thränert, Oliver

Abstract

In its new strategic concept of November 2010, allies agreed that »as long as nuclear weapons exist, NATO will remain a nuclear alliance.« As clear as this statement appears at first glance, NATO allies continue to debate the role of nuclear weapons. By the same token, NATO agreed at the 2010 Lisbon summit to »develop the capability to defend our populations and territories against ballistic missile attack as a core element of our collective defense,« but allies still differ in their views about the significance and future role of missile defenses. The Lisbon summit declaration adopted a procedural compromise and tasked the NATO Council »to continue to review NATO's overall posture in deterring and defending against the full range of threats to the Alliance.« This procedure became known as the Defense and Deterrence Posture Review (DDPR). Alliance members will use the time until the next NATO summit - scheduled to take place on May 20 and 21, 2012, in Chicago - to consider the appropriate mix of nuclear, conventional and missile defense forces for NATO

Suggested Citation

  • Thränert, Oliver, 2011. "NATO's Deterrence and Defense Posture Review," SWP Comments 34/2011, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), German Institute for International and Security Affairs.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:swpcom:342011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/256172/1/2011C34.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:swpcom:342011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.swp-berlin.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.