IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/swpcom/242012.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The case for a European Defence Review: Why national-level armed forces planning is not enough

Author

Listed:
  • Dickow, Marcel
  • Linnenkamp, Hilmar
  • Mölling, Christian

Abstract

The EU's Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) is on the verge of collapse due to a lack of common resources and capabilities. Indeed, the EU Member States have an excess of some things, such as frigates and fighter aircraft, but an inadequate supply of other important components, including aerial refueling and reconnaissance capabili-ties. This is primarily because national preferences and traditions continue to play the decisive role in European defence planning. Despite the financial crisis and resulting austerity measures - and despite the often reiterated commitment to the CSDP vision - there is still a lack of resolve among EU Member States to building common ground in security and defence policy. It is not enough to seek cooperation in isolated areas through the pooling and sharing of capabilities or to announce the advent of "smarter defence". These measures will not be enough to move armed forces development from the narrow national level to a broader European base. A European Defence Review would establish a new point of departure for the development and coordination of the required capabilities. National military planning - an ongoing element of national sovereignty - requires such a framework if it is to be useful for the CSDP

Suggested Citation

  • Dickow, Marcel & Linnenkamp, Hilmar & Mölling, Christian, 2012. "The case for a European Defence Review: Why national-level armed forces planning is not enough," SWP Comments 24/2012, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), German Institute for International and Security Affairs.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:swpcom:242012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/256205/1/2012C24.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:swpcom:242012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.swp-berlin.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.