IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/swpcom/202008.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

EU foreign policy perspectives: A call for the revival of the Weimar Triangle

Author

Listed:
  • Bendiek, Annegret

Abstract

The rejection of the Treaty of Lisbon by the Irish has given rise to the possibility of revisiting its central tenets. This is urgently needed for the formulation of a coherent European Foreign and Security Policy. While the new member states tend to have a transatlantic orientation, many old member states are seeking to make Europe more independent from the US. Tension exists between Central and Eastern European security interests and Western European energy policy as regards relations with Russia. The European Neighbourhood Policy is seeing a juxtaposition of unconnected political projects, such as the Mediterranean Union initiated by Paris, and enlargement to in-clude additional Eastern European states, which has the support of many Central and Eastern European nations. The Treaty of Lisbon offers no real solutions to any of this. It does not provide for decisions to be made on the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) by qualified majority as a rule. Attaining a unanimous decision in the Council on delicate issues of foreign and security policy has become more difficult, especially since the EU's enlargement to 27 member states. Against this background, it seems necessary to encourage the formation of foreign policy groupings, and especially to revitalize the close coordination between Germany, Poland and France in what is known as the "Weimar Triangle"

Suggested Citation

  • Bendiek, Annegret, 2008. "EU foreign policy perspectives: A call for the revival of the Weimar Triangle," SWP Comments 20/2008, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), German Institute for International and Security Affairs.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:swpcom:202008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/256063/1/2008C20.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:swpcom:202008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.swp-berlin.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.