IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/svrwwp/082016.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Zur Vereinheitlichung des Rentenrechts

Author

Listed:
  • Feld, Lars P.
  • Kohlmeier, Anabell

Abstract

Mehr als 25 Jahre nach der Deutschen Einheit werden die Renten in Ost- und Westdeutschland noch immer auf Basis unterschiedlicher rentenrechtlicher Größen berechnet. Dies führt zu verschiedenen Ungleichbehandlungen und wird zunehmend als unangemessen angesehen. Alle Vorschläge zur Rechtsangleichung sind jedoch mit gewissen Nachteilen verbunden; es gibt keine Lösung, die alle Betroffenen gleichermaßen zufriedenstellen wird. Allerdings weist der Vorschlag, den der Sachverständigenrat in seinem Jahresgutachten 2008/09 skizziert hat, nach wie vor gegenüber den Alternativen erhebliche Vorzüge auf.

Suggested Citation

  • Feld, Lars P. & Kohlmeier, Anabell, 2016. "Zur Vereinheitlichung des Rentenrechts," Working Papers 08/2016, German Council of Economic Experts / Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:svrwwp:082016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/147978/1/872409902.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joachim Ragnitz, 2012. "Approaches to Standardizing the Pension System in Germany," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 65(04), pages 16-21, February.
    2. Axel Börsch‐Supan & Tabea Bucher‐Koenen & Martin Gasche & Christina Benita Wilke, 2010. "Ein einheitliches Rentensystem für Ost‐ und Westdeutschland: Simulationsrechnungen zum Reformvorschlag des Sachverständigenrates," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 11(1), pages 16-46, February.
    3. Eckart Bomsdorf, 2016. "Rapid Introduction of a Uniform Pension Value in East and West – Proposal for a "Pension Reconciliation Act"," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 69(10), pages 27-33, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antje Schubert, 2016. "Mehr als 25 Jahre nach der Deutschen Einheit nun auch ein einheitliches Rentensystem?," ifo Dresden berichtet, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 23(03), pages 03-04, June.
    2. Johannes Geyer, 2016. "Zur Debatte um die Angleichung des Rentenrechts in Ost und West," DIW Roundup: Politik im Fokus 101, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    3. Eckart Bomsdorf, 2016. "Rapid Introduction of a Uniform Pension Value in East and West – Proposal for a "Pension Reconciliation Act"," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 69(10), pages 27-33, May.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D78 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation
    • H55 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Social Security and Public Pensions
    • H75 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Government: Health, Education, and Welfare

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:svrwwp:082016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/svrgvde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.